The ethics of digital communication in hybrid societies: cyberloafing, empathy and relational accountability

Purpose This study aims to explore how cyberloafing − commonly viewed as a counterproductive or stress-related behavior − can be reinterpreted through a relational and ethical lens. It investigates how digital communication technologies in hybrid work settings alter the moral perception of online behaviors, focusing especially on the differences between online and offline manifestations of cyberloafing and their relational consequences. Design/methodology/approach Integrating insights from moral psychology, construal level theory and relational ethics, this paper draws on recent empirical and conceptual research to assess how cyberloafing affects interpersonal accountability and empathy. Special attention is given to how technology-mediated communication transforms the ethical salience of cyberloafing in hybrid workplaces, where online and offline interactions coexist but operate under different perceptual and moral dynamics. Findings Digital environments amplify the moral significance of cyberloafing by muting social cues and increasing psychological distance. The same act − such as a delayed response or passive disengagement − may be perceived as more ethically disruptive in online contexts than in face-to-face interactions. Empathic concern is more likely to be activated because information and communication technologies obscure intent, prompting coworkers to interpret silence or withdrawal as a relational breach. This highlights how moral meaning depends not only on behavior but also on the medium of communication through which it is perceived. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explicitly compare the interpersonal and ethical consequences of cyberloafing in both online and offline settings. It responds to recent calls for more contextualized approaches to workplace deviance and contributes to a richer understanding of how digital communication shapes moral sensitivity, responsibility and care in technology-mediated work societies. The framework proposed bridges individual behavior with broader concerns in information ethics and communication responsibility, offering a fresh lens on digital accountability at work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-07-2025-0196
Primary Topic
Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethics of digital communication in hybrid societies: cyberloafing, empathy and relational accountability

Pablo Zoghbi‐Manrique‐de‐Lara
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
article

The ethics of digital communication in hybrid societies: cyberloafing, empathy and relational accountability

Pablo Zoghbi‐Manrique‐de‐Lara
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore how cyberloafing − commonly viewed as a counterproductive or stress-related behavior − can be reinterpreted through a relational and ethical lens. It investigates how digital communication technologies in hybrid work settings alter the moral perception of online behaviors, focusing especially on the differences between online and offline manifestations of cyberloafing and their relational consequences. Design/methodology/approach Integrating insights from moral psychology, construal level theory and relational ethics, this paper draws on recent empirical and conceptual research to assess how cyberloafing affects interpersonal accountability and empathy. Special attention is given to how technology-mediated communication transforms the ethical salience of cyberloafing in hybrid workplaces, where online and offline interactions coexist but operate under different perceptual and moral dynamics. Findings Digital environments amplify the moral significance of cyberloafing by muting social cues and increasing psychological distance. The same act − such as a delayed response or passive disengagement − may be perceived as more ethically disruptive in online contexts than in face-to-face interactions. Empathic concern is more likely to be activated because information and communication technologies obscure intent, prompting coworkers to interpret silence or withdrawal as a relational breach. This highlights how moral meaning depends not only on behavior but also on the medium of communication through which it is perceived. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explicitly compare the interpersonal and ethical consequences of cyberloafing in both online and offline settings. It responds to recent calls for more contextualized approaches to workplace deviance and contributes to a richer understanding of how digital communication shapes moral sensitivity, responsibility and care in technology-mediated work societies. The framework proposed bridges individual behavior with broader concerns in information ethics and communication responsibility, offering a fresh lens on digital accountability at work.

Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.