Understanding of ironic and literal utterances in 4–9-year-old typically developing children: role of age, narrative skills, emotion comprehension and executive functions

Language comprehension is essential to communication, yet understanding varies between literal meaning and verbal irony. While children grasp words' surface meanings, interpreting verbal irony requires them to consider context and infer the speaker's true intent, revealing a deeper layer of meaning. What factors contribute to this complex skill? The current study examined the impact of sex, narrative skills, executive functions (working memory and inhibitory control), theory of mind and emotion comprehension, while controlling for age, on understanding of literal statements and verbal irony in 267 typically developing 4-9-year old children (130 boys). To assess children's irony comprehension, we presented them with cartoon scenarios and asked to choose an emoji to indicate whether a parent's reaction was literal or ironic. A full-null model approach was used to examine the impact of children's cognitive, executive, emotional, and narrative skills on their irony understanding, where the full contained our factors of interest and the null contained only age and sex. The results indicated that age was the only factor related to literal meaning comprehension. In contrast, both age and working memory were significantly related to irony understanding. These findings can be used as a foundation for developing training to enhance non-literal language and pragmatic skills in children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1718227
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding of ironic and literal utterances in 4–9-year-old typically developing children: role of age, narrative skills, emotion comprehension and executive functions

Natalia Kartushina, Ekaterina Oshchepkova, M. Kovyazina
Frontiers in Psychology
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Understanding of ironic and literal utterances in 4–9-year-old typically developing children: role of age, narrative skills, emotion comprehension and executive functions

Natalia Kartushina, Ekaterina Oshchepkova, M. Kovyazina
article en

Abstract

Language comprehension is essential to communication, yet understanding varies between literal meaning and verbal irony. While children grasp words' surface meanings, interpreting verbal irony requires them to consider context and infer the speaker's true intent, revealing a deeper layer of meaning. What factors contribute to this complex skill? The current study examined the impact of sex, narrative skills, executive functions (working memory and inhibitory control), theory of mind and emotion comprehension, while controlling for age, on understanding of literal statements and verbal irony in 267 typically developing 4-9-year old children (130 boys). To assess children's irony comprehension, we presented them with cartoon scenarios and asked to choose an emoji to indicate whether a parent's reaction was literal or ironic. A full-null model approach was used to examine the impact of children's cognitive, executive, emotional, and narrative skills on their irony understanding, where the full contained our factors of interest and the null contained only age and sex. The results indicated that age was the only factor related to literal meaning comprehension. In contrast, both age and working memory were significantly related to irony understanding. These findings can be used as a foundation for developing training to enhance non-literal language and pragmatic skills in children.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
University of Oslo (NO), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Nordic Institute of Dental Materials (NO)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.