The influence of bilingualism on statistical word learning: a registered report

Abstract While statistical word learning has been the focus of many studies on monolinguals, it has received little attention in bilinguals. The results of existing studies on statistical word learning in bilinguals are inconsistent, with some research reporting a bilingual advantage over monolinguals but others finding no difference between groups. Thus, our study investigated statistical learning using the cross-situational word learning (CSWL) paradigm between two groups: English–German bilinguals and English monolinguals. Participants (N = 201) learned 1 : 1 mappings (one word maps onto one object) and 1 : 2 mappings (one word maps onto two objects). In contrast to previous studies, we measured learning continuously and analysed trial-by-trial behaviour closely to understand fine-grained learning differences across language groups. Against our predictions, monolinguals generally outperformed bilinguals in word learning regardless of mapping type, and trial-by-trial analyses did not reveal differences in learning as expected. Moreover, language balancedness of bilinguals (operationalized via language entropy) did not account for differences in CSWL performance. These results suggest that any existing word learning advantages may be highly paradigm- and population-specific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251768
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of bilingualism on statistical word learning: a registered report

Matilde Ellen Simonetti, Tanja C. Roembke, Iring Koch, Megan G. Lorenz
1 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
article

The influence of bilingualism on statistical word learning: a registered report

Matilde Ellen Simonetti, Tanja C. Roembke, Iring Koch, Megan G. Lorenz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract While statistical word learning has been the focus of many studies on monolinguals, it has received little attention in bilinguals. The results of existing studies on statistical word learning in bilinguals are inconsistent, with some research reporting a bilingual advantage over monolinguals but others finding no difference between groups. Thus, our study investigated statistical learning using the cross-situational word learning (CSWL) paradigm between two groups: English–German bilinguals and English monolinguals. Participants (N = 201) learned 1 : 1 mappings (one word maps onto one object) and 1 : 2 mappings (one word maps onto two objects). In contrast to previous studies, we measured learning continuously and analysed trial-by-trial behaviour closely to understand fine-grained learning differences across language groups. Against our predictions, monolinguals generally outperformed bilinguals in word learning regardless of mapping type, and trial-by-trial analyses did not reveal differences in learning as expected. Moreover, language balancedness of bilinguals (operationalized via language entropy) did not account for differences in CSWL performance. These results suggest that any existing word learning advantages may be highly paradigm- and population-specific.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 12(12)
Augustana College (US), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.