Costs and benefits of early access to new cancer drugs through the US Food and Drug Administration’s accelerated approval pathway: retrospective observational study and economic evaluation

This study examined the trade-off between the benefits of earlier access to cancer drugs through the FDA's accelerated approval pathway and the uncertainty surrounding their clinical efficacy at the time of market entry. Accelerated approval yielded uneven survival returns, with a small number of drugs accounting for the majority of life year gains. Medicare incurred substantial costs for treatments that, in over half of cases, did not provide an overall survival benefit to patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001934
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Costs and benefits of early access to new cancer drugs through the US Food and Drug Administration’s accelerated approval pathway: retrospective observational study and economic evaluation

Anita Katharina Wagner, Rebecca Costa, Joseph S. Ross, Peter J. Murphy et al.
BMJ Medicine
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Costs and benefits of early access to new cancer drugs through the US Food and Drug Administration’s accelerated approval pathway: retrospective observational study and economic evaluation

Anita Katharina Wagner, Rebecca Costa, Joseph S. Ross, Peter J. Murphy, Huseyin Naci, Yichen Zhang, Mahnum Shahzad
article en

Abstract

This study examined the trade-off between the benefits of earlier access to cancer drugs through the FDA's accelerated approval pathway and the uncertainty surrounding their clinical efficacy at the time of market entry. Accelerated approval yielded uneven survival returns, with a small number of drugs accounting for the majority of life year gains. Medicare incurred substantial costs for treatments that, in over half of cases, did not provide an overall survival benefit to patients.

BMJ MedicineVol. 4(1)
Transparency International (CZ), Yale New Haven Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Peking University (CN), Royal Pharmaceutical Society (GB), Yale University (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US), University of York (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
London School of Economics and Political Science, King's College London
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.