Underwater soundscape indicates low anthropogenic influence around two sub-Antarctic islands

Abstract Contributions and effects of anthropogenic activities on the underwater soundscape of the sub-Antarctic regions remain poorly studied. Over a 21-month period (April 2021 to December 2022), we recorded underwater noise levels amid two sub-Antarctic Prince Edward Islands (PEIs) within an offshore marine protected area with the aim to quantitatively investigate the sources of underwater noise and the impact of such noise on the detectability of marine mammal vocalizations. We measured underwater noise levels within the low (20–120 and 121–800 Hz), medium (801–25 000 Hz) and high (25 001–48 000 Hz) frequency bands. Wind speed was the primary predictor of low and medium frequency underwater noise levels, whereas iceberg volume was the primary predictor at the high frequency band. Probabilities of detecting vocalizations of Antarctic blue, fin, humpback, Antarctic minke and killer whales decreased with increasing noise levels. On the contrary, probabilities of detecting sei and Madagascan pygmy blue whale vocalizations increased with noise levels. Overall, these novel results indicate that geophonic noise dominates the underwater soundscape of the PEIs in the absence of intense anthropogenic activities such as marine traffic, and that the detectability of marine mammal underwater vocalizations is species-specific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.250677
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underwater soundscape indicates low anthropogenic influence around two sub-Antarctic islands

Fannie W. Shabangu, Dawit Yemane, Nicky Stander, Bobbi J. Estabrook
2 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Marine animal studies overview
3.43
article

Underwater soundscape indicates low anthropogenic influence around two sub-Antarctic islands

Fannie W. Shabangu, Dawit Yemane, Nicky Stander, Bobbi J. Estabrook
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Contributions and effects of anthropogenic activities on the underwater soundscape of the sub-Antarctic regions remain poorly studied. Over a 21-month period (April 2021 to December 2022), we recorded underwater noise levels amid two sub-Antarctic Prince Edward Islands (PEIs) within an offshore marine protected area with the aim to quantitatively investigate the sources of underwater noise and the impact of such noise on the detectability of marine mammal vocalizations. We measured underwater noise levels within the low (20–120 and 121–800 Hz), medium (801–25 000 Hz) and high (25 001–48 000 Hz) frequency bands. Wind speed was the primary predictor of low and medium frequency underwater noise levels, whereas iceberg volume was the primary predictor at the high frequency band. Probabilities of detecting vocalizations of Antarctic blue, fin, humpback, Antarctic minke and killer whales decreased with increasing noise levels. On the contrary, probabilities of detecting sei and Madagascan pygmy blue whale vocalizations increased with noise levels. Overall, these novel results indicate that geophonic noise dominates the underwater soundscape of the PEIs in the absence of intense anthropogenic activities such as marine traffic, and that the detectability of marine mammal underwater vocalizations is species-specific.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 12(12)
African Wildlife Foundation (US), Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (ZA), Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (KH), Cornell University (US), Department of Forestry (MW), University of Pretoria (ZA)
National Research Foundation, Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Marine animal studies overview
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.