Canine companions and the human–animal bond as a bipartisan bridge for support of homelessness services

Abstract Background: Americans are deeply attached to their pets, and owning a dog has been shown to provide numerous emotional, social, and physical benefits to owners, especially for people experiencing homelessness (PEH). Despite research indicating that both PEH and their pets benefit from staying together, few studies have explored how the public perceives these individuals. Since public opinion can influence policies and resource distribution, this study aimed to better understand the public’s perception of PEH with dogs and to identify factors, including political affiliation, that shape their attitudes and support for policies. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey through Prolific in June 2025 to gauge opinions and attitudes regarding PEH with dogs, as well as support for policies and resources for these individuals. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, ordinal, and multiple linear regressions, and post hoc analyses were performed. Regression analyses were conducted to test the effects of four different educational messages, compared to a no-message control, controlling for demographic factors, on perceptions of community resource allocation and priority for PEH with dogs. Results: A total of 370 individuals from the USA completed the survey. Nearly 40% of participants reported encountering PEH with a dog at least several times a month. Despite 91% believing that a dog would have a better quality of life with a housed owner, the majority (76%) felt that PEH with a dog should have access to resources to care for their pet. Moreover, only 14% thought that if someone becomes homeless, they should rehome their dog. These views did not significantly differ based on the educational message received or political ideology. Conclusion: This study found that most people, regardless of political party, recognize the importance of the human–animal bond and support resource allocation to help PEH with dogs. These findings highlight an opportunity to build bipartisan support for programs benefiting both humans and animals. Framing interventions and policies through the lens of animal welfare and the human–animal bond may help bridge political divides and promote broader support for services aiding PEH. Future research should explore how the human–animal bond can bridge political divides and evaluate messaging strategies to increase support for relevant policies.