Facilitators and barriers to planning integration: Insights from Multi-plan Integration in China

Integration in spatial planning remains a persistent challenge, especially amid growing environmental and societal complexities that demand coordinated solutions. While much research highlights facilitating factors for integration, less attention has been given to barriers that hinder cohesive planning, particularly within centralized governance contexts. This paper addresses this gap by investigating how Multi-Plan Integration (MPI) operates in practice within Chinas spatial planning system. Through a comparative case study of three MPI projects and one non-MPI project, we identify the effects, facilitators, and inhibitors of integration. Findings reveal that MPI can improve integration outcomes when supported by enabling institutional, instrumental, and contextual conditions, such as collaborative networks, effective process management, and adequate resources, but it does not guarantee success due to persistent challenges including fragmented expertise, low capacity of connective actors, and limited collaborative culture. Importantly, integration emerges not solely from top-down mandates but through bottom-up coordination, informal communication, and adaptive governance practices. This study contributes to spatial planning literature by highlighting pathways to integration in hybrid governance systems and provides an analytical framework for understanding the complex dynamics shaping planning integration. • MPI improves integration outcomes when accompanied by enabling contexts and tailored strategies. • Facilitators include supportive contexts, positive collaboration history, and suitable governance structures. • Inhibitors include fragmented planning teams, limited connective capacity, and unintended consequences of past history. • Integration arises not solely from mandates but also through bottom-up coordination, informal communication, and adaptive governance. • Planning is a complex, iterative, and multi-directional process across actors and authority levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106741
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitators and barriers to planning integration: Insights from Multi-plan Integration in China

Lasse Gerrits, Jurian Edelenbos, Xiaopeng Sun, Cai Min
Cities
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Facilitators and barriers to planning integration: Insights from Multi-plan Integration in China

Lasse Gerrits, Jurian Edelenbos, Xiaopeng Sun, Cai Min
article en

Abstract

Integration in spatial planning remains a persistent challenge, especially amid growing environmental and societal complexities that demand coordinated solutions. While much research highlights facilitating factors for integration, less attention has been given to barriers that hinder cohesive planning, particularly within centralized governance contexts. This paper addresses this gap by investigating how Multi-Plan Integration (MPI) operates in practice within Chinas spatial planning system. Through a comparative case study of three MPI projects and one non-MPI project, we identify the effects, facilitators, and inhibitors of integration. Findings reveal that MPI can improve integration outcomes when supported by enabling institutional, instrumental, and contextual conditions, such as collaborative networks, effective process management, and adequate resources, but it does not guarantee success due to persistent challenges including fragmented expertise, low capacity of connective actors, and limited collaborative culture. Importantly, integration emerges not solely from top-down mandates but through bottom-up coordination, informal communication, and adaptive governance practices. This study contributes to spatial planning literature by highlighting pathways to integration in hybrid governance systems and provides an analytical framework for understanding the complex dynamics shaping planning integration. • MPI improves integration outcomes when accompanied by enabling contexts and tailored strategies. • Facilitators include supportive contexts, positive collaboration history, and suitable governance structures. • Inhibitors include fragmented planning teams, limited connective capacity, and unintended consequences of past history. • Integration arises not solely from mandates but also through bottom-up coordination, informal communication, and adaptive governance. • Planning is a complex, iterative, and multi-directional process across actors and authority levels.

CitiesVol. 171
Bureau of Energy (TW), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.