Climbing the ladder under pressure: precarious manhood and the ambition gender gap

Purpose Women are underrepresented in high-level positions, which has often been attributed to women being less likely to actively pursue higher level positions. Previous studies have focused on the mechanisms underlying women's career ambitions, ignoring how framings of masculinity relate to the ambition gender gap. Building on precarious manhood theory, we propose that men's higher levels of career ambitions can be understood as a response to their concerns about living up to standards of masculinity and the pressure to prove themselves as “real men”. Accordingly, we hypothesized an interaction between gender identity threat and participant gender in predicting career ambition. Design/methodology/approach In line with previous research, we manipulated gender identity threat versus affirmation by giving participants bogus feedback on a gender identity assessment. Thereafter, we measured participants' career ambitions. Additionally, we assessed masculinity contest culture – based on participants' perceptions of their real-world employer – as a moderator variable. Findings As predicted, results revealed an interaction effect between gender identity threat and participant gender on career ambitions. In contrast to our predictions, however, this effect was not moderated by participants' perceptions of masculinity contest culture. Originality/value By focusing on men and framings of masculinity, our results provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying gender differences in career ambitions. To our knowledge, the current work is the first to demonstrate that gender identity affirmation reduces the ambition gender gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Career Development International
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-01-2025-0046
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climbing the ladder under pressure: precarious manhood and the ambition gender gap

Andreas Mojzisch, Malte Roswag
Career Development International
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Climbing the ladder under pressure: precarious manhood and the ambition gender gap

Andreas Mojzisch, Malte Roswag
article en

Abstract

Purpose Women are underrepresented in high-level positions, which has often been attributed to women being less likely to actively pursue higher level positions. Previous studies have focused on the mechanisms underlying women's career ambitions, ignoring how framings of masculinity relate to the ambition gender gap. Building on precarious manhood theory, we propose that men's higher levels of career ambitions can be understood as a response to their concerns about living up to standards of masculinity and the pressure to prove themselves as “real men”. Accordingly, we hypothesized an interaction between gender identity threat and participant gender in predicting career ambition. Design/methodology/approach In line with previous research, we manipulated gender identity threat versus affirmation by giving participants bogus feedback on a gender identity assessment. Thereafter, we measured participants' career ambitions. Additionally, we assessed masculinity contest culture – based on participants' perceptions of their real-world employer – as a moderator variable. Findings As predicted, results revealed an interaction effect between gender identity threat and participant gender on career ambitions. In contrast to our predictions, however, this effect was not moderated by participants' perceptions of masculinity contest culture. Originality/value By focusing on men and framings of masculinity, our results provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying gender differences in career ambitions. To our knowledge, the current work is the first to demonstrate that gender identity affirmation reduces the ambition gender gap.

Career Development International
University of Hildesheim (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.