Factors influencing the performance of clinical research networks to improve the success of cancer clinical trials: A scoping review and organizational analysis

Cancer clinical research networks (CRNs) play a vital role in medical research globally by generating investigator-initiated research, pooling expertise, and enabling recruitment across multiple sites. Completing clinical trials is challenging. Delays can slow the generation of evidence needed to refine the best patient treatments. The aim of this review was to identify factors that have been either proposed or shown by research to influence the performance of cancer CRNs to improve trial success, outcomes and impact. A scoping review was conducted using a systematic search across five databases [PROSPERO CRD42023414241]. Records were screened for eligibility. For included articles, data on factors and research methods were extracted independently by up to three reviewers, and disagreements resolved by discussion. 1928 articles were returned, 13 were included. Articles reported on 11 membership-based cancer CRNs with headquarters in four countries (eight in the USA). Factors influencing CRN performance broadly fell into six categories: site, CRN, patient, regulatory, policy and industry factors, with subcategories in each case. These findings may help to inform future research to prioritize and improve the day-to-day performance of membership-based cancer CRNs and other trial sponsors to optimize clinical trial success. Further research is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10210
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing the performance of clinical research networks to improve the success of cancer clinical trials: A scoping review and organizational analysis

Tim Luckett, Gerald B. Fogarty, Aoife M. Shannon, Elizabeth J. Paton et al.
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Factors influencing the performance of clinical research networks to improve the success of cancer clinical trials: A scoping review and organizational analysis

Tim Luckett, Gerald B. Fogarty, Aoife M. Shannon, Elizabeth J. Paton, Deborah S. Debono
article en

Abstract

Cancer clinical research networks (CRNs) play a vital role in medical research globally by generating investigator-initiated research, pooling expertise, and enabling recruitment across multiple sites. Completing clinical trials is challenging. Delays can slow the generation of evidence needed to refine the best patient treatments. The aim of this review was to identify factors that have been either proposed or shown by research to influence the performance of cancer CRNs to improve trial success, outcomes and impact. A scoping review was conducted using a systematic search across five databases [PROSPERO CRD42023414241]. Records were screened for eligibility. For included articles, data on factors and research methods were extracted independently by up to three reviewers, and disagreements resolved by discussion. 1928 articles were returned, 13 were included. Articles reported on 11 membership-based cancer CRNs with headquarters in four countries (eight in the USA). Factors influencing CRN performance broadly fell into six categories: site, CRN, patient, regulatory, policy and industry factors, with subcategories in each case. These findings may help to inform future research to prioritize and improve the day-to-day performance of membership-based cancer CRNs and other trial sponsors to optimize clinical trial success. Further research is warranted.

Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 10(1)
University of Notre Dame (US), University of Technology Sydney (AU), Australian Institute of Business (AU), National Cancer Centre Japan (JP), Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (AU), Dattoli Cancer Center and Brachytherapy Research Institute (US)
Australian Government, University of Technology Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.