Do Institutional Investors Care Firm Environmental Litigation Risk—Evidence From Environmental Courts in China

Institutional investors, as crucial participants in the capital market, we examine the impact of corporate environmental litigation risks on their investment behavior, under the background of the “Two-Carbon target”. We find that institutional investors significantly reduce their holdings in corporate with high environmental litigation risks, after the establishment of intermediate environmental court. Firms can mitigate environmental litigation risks by implementing voluntary environmental regulations. Further, improvements in environmental justice affect institutional investors’ investment behavior by influencing the status of environmental judicial cases in the region and enhancing environmental administrative supervision. As for investor heterogeneity, firms with higher levels of social and environmental responsibility are more in line with green institutional investors, who care environmental protection. Private and small enterprises can enhance their comparative competitive advantage in green investment development by shouldering social and environmental responsibilities actively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
经济学报.
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/cje.2024.9300412
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Institutional Investors Care Firm Environmental Litigation Risk—Evidence From Environmental Courts in China

Wenqin Feng, Tiezhu Zhang
经济学报.
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Do Institutional Investors Care Firm Environmental Litigation Risk—Evidence From Environmental Courts in China

Wenqin Feng, Tiezhu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Institutional investors, as crucial participants in the capital market, we examine the impact of corporate environmental litigation risks on their investment behavior, under the background of the “Two-Carbon target”. We find that institutional investors significantly reduce their holdings in corporate with high environmental litigation risks, after the establishment of intermediate environmental court. Firms can mitigate environmental litigation risks by implementing voluntary environmental regulations. Further, improvements in environmental justice affect institutional investors’ investment behavior by influencing the status of environmental judicial cases in the region and enhancing environmental administrative supervision. As for investor heterogeneity, firms with higher levels of social and environmental responsibility are more in line with green institutional investors, who care environmental protection. Private and small enterprises can enhance their comparative competitive advantage in green investment development by shouldering social and environmental responsibilities actively.

经济学报.Vol. 11(4)
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), Shanghai University of International Business and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Institutional Investors Care Firm Environmental Litigation Risk—Evidence From Environmental Courts in China — Wenqin Feng, Tiezhu Zhang · 经济学报. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS