Psychological Safety, AI-Enabled Anonymous Communication, and Speaking Up in Audit Teams

SUMMARY Staff auditors are often reluctant to voice concerns due to the perceived negative consequences of speaking up. We investigate the role of psychological safety in auditors’ voice. We hypothesize and find that psychological safety is a crucial mediator that explains the effects of various contextual, issue, and individual factors on auditors’ decisions to speak up. We also study whether providing an AI-enabled anonymous communication channel improves auditors’ voice decisions through psychological safety. Contrary to findings in other team settings where enhanced anonymity increases employees’ voice, we do not observe such an effect in the audit team setting. We discuss the reasons for this unique result and its implications for designing interventions that enhance psychological safety to improve auditors’ voice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2024-148
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Safety, AI-Enabled Anonymous Communication, and Speaking Up in Audit Teams

Yuepin Zhou, Emily Elaine Griffith, Dongsheng Li
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Psychological Safety, AI-Enabled Anonymous Communication, and Speaking Up in Audit Teams

Yuepin Zhou, Emily Elaine Griffith, Dongsheng Li
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY Staff auditors are often reluctant to voice concerns due to the perceived negative consequences of speaking up. We investigate the role of psychological safety in auditors’ voice. We hypothesize and find that psychological safety is a crucial mediator that explains the effects of various contextual, issue, and individual factors on auditors’ decisions to speak up. We also study whether providing an AI-enabled anonymous communication channel improves auditors’ voice decisions through psychological safety. Contrary to findings in other team settings where enhanced anonymity increases employees’ voice, we do not observe such an effect in the audit team setting. We discuss the reasons for this unique result and its implications for designing interventions that enhance psychological safety to improve auditors’ voice.

Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.