Forest Carbon Offsetting in Kenya

The paper discusses the topic of forest carbon offset projects, focusing on the case of Kenya. The analysis follows 24 projects developed in the period 2010-2024, implemented in the framework of the Clean Development Mechanism or certified by three leading institutions in the voluntary carbon market (Verra, Gold Standard, Plan Vivo) and combines national-level analysis with insights into specific cases. The theoretical discussion follows four interpretative axes: methodology, production of nature, value distribution, and the role of the state. The analysis shows that methods used in forest carbon offset projects are flawed, and that the power relations between the actors are highly asymmetrical. As a result, the distribution of costs and benefits is often extremely unequal between the companies of the global North, and the local communities in Kenya, thus questioning the link between development and environmental protection that should underpin this kind of projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Les Cahiers d Afrique de lEst
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/15cv6
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest Carbon Offsetting in Kenya

Stefania Albertazzi, Valerio Bini, C. F. Sacchi, Mattia Fumagalli
Les Cahiers d Afrique de lEst
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Forest Carbon Offsetting in Kenya

Stefania Albertazzi, Valerio Bini, C. F. Sacchi, Mattia Fumagalli
article en

Abstract

The paper discusses the topic of forest carbon offset projects, focusing on the case of Kenya. The analysis follows 24 projects developed in the period 2010-2024, implemented in the framework of the Clean Development Mechanism or certified by three leading institutions in the voluntary carbon market (Verra, Gold Standard, Plan Vivo) and combines national-level analysis with insights into specific cases. The theoretical discussion follows four interpretative axes: methodology, production of nature, value distribution, and the role of the state. The analysis shows that methods used in forest carbon offset projects are flawed, and that the power relations between the actors are highly asymmetrical. As a result, the distribution of costs and benefits is often extremely unequal between the companies of the global North, and the local communities in Kenya, thus questioning the link between development and environmental protection that should underpin this kind of projects.

Les Cahiers d Afrique de lEstVol. 61
Institut Français de l'Éducation (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forest Carbon Offsetting in Kenya — Stefania Albertazzi, Valerio Bini, et al. · Les Cahiers d Afrique de lEst (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS