Exploring Gender Identity Cues in Email Signature Blocks: An Experimental Study

This study examines the effects of gender identity cues in email signatures on outcomes of misgendering, trait perceptions, social exclusion, and language use and how these effects are moderated by transphobia. Using a 3 x 2 between-subjects design, cisgender participants (N = 354) read and responded to a forwarded email containing gender identity cues in the signature block with varying pronouns (they/them, she/her, and he/him) and the trans flag emoji (present or absent). There were significant outcomes for social exclusion and language use but not misgendering or trait perceptions. Higher exclusion was associated with they/them and she/her pronouns. The trans flag emoji interacted with transphobia to reduce the use of power-related language as transphobia increased. Further, email signatures including the trans flag emoji directly influenced use of netspeak, or highly informal online language (e.g., u r gr8). Theoretical implications of transphobia and bias toward gender identity cues are discussed alongside practical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Language and Communication
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2025-0018
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Gender Identity Cues in Email Signature Blocks: An Experimental Study

Nicholas A. Palomares, Cameron W. Piercy, Rebecca Baumler
Psychology of Language and Communication
Digital Communication and Language
article

Exploring Gender Identity Cues in Email Signature Blocks: An Experimental Study

Nicholas A. Palomares, Cameron W. Piercy, Rebecca Baumler
article en

Abstract

This study examines the effects of gender identity cues in email signatures on outcomes of misgendering, trait perceptions, social exclusion, and language use and how these effects are moderated by transphobia. Using a 3 x 2 between-subjects design, cisgender participants (N = 354) read and responded to a forwarded email containing gender identity cues in the signature block with varying pronouns (they/them, she/her, and he/him) and the trans flag emoji (present or absent). There were significant outcomes for social exclusion and language use but not misgendering or trait perceptions. Higher exclusion was associated with they/them and she/her pronouns. The trans flag emoji interacted with transphobia to reduce the use of power-related language as transphobia increased. Further, email signatures including the trans flag emoji directly influenced use of netspeak, or highly informal online language (e.g., u r gr8). Theoretical implications of transphobia and bias toward gender identity cues are discussed alongside practical implications.

Psychology of Language and Communication
University of Kansas (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.