A Commentary on Chatterjee Et Al. (2018): A Corrected Framework for Group Sparsity in Zero‐Inflated Negative Binomial Models

We reexamine GOOOGLE, the group-regularized zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) approach of Chatterjee et al. We show that in the released implementation, the tuning parameter is selected using a Bayesian information criterion (BIC) computed on a Gaussian surrogate. Because the unpenalized model fits this surrogate exactly (with zero residual sum of squares), the BIC always favors essentially unpenalized solutions and fails to induce group sparsity. This results in zero group specificity in simulations mirroring the original paper's design. We demonstrate that this issue is resolved by selecting the tuning parameter using the true ZINB log-likelihood. Furthermore, we propose the fully iterative group broken adaptive ridge (grBAR) estimator as a more robust alternative. Our open-source R package, group regularization algorithms for zero-inflated models (GRAZIMs), provides these tools to enable reliable group selection in ZINB models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70356
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Commentary on Chatterjee Et Al. (2018): A Corrected Framework for Group Sparsity in Zero‐Inflated Negative Binomial Models

Himel Mallick, Emmanuel Ogundimu, Adam Iqbal
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

A Commentary on Chatterjee Et Al. (2018): A Corrected Framework for Group Sparsity in Zero‐Inflated Negative Binomial Models

Himel Mallick, Emmanuel Ogundimu, Adam Iqbal
article en

Abstract

We reexamine GOOOGLE, the group-regularized zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) approach of Chatterjee et al. We show that in the released implementation, the tuning parameter is selected using a Bayesian information criterion (BIC) computed on a Gaussian surrogate. Because the unpenalized model fits this surrogate exactly (with zero residual sum of squares), the BIC always favors essentially unpenalized solutions and fails to induce group sparsity. This results in zero group specificity in simulations mirroring the original paper's design. We demonstrate that this issue is resolved by selecting the tuning parameter using the true ZINB log-likelihood. Furthermore, we propose the fully iterative group broken adaptive ridge (grBAR) estimator as a more robust alternative. Our open-source R package, group regularization algorithms for zero-inflated models (GRAZIMs), provides these tools to enable reliable group selection in ZINB models.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(28-30)
Durham University (GB), Cornell University (US)
Wellcome Trust, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Division of Mathematical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Commentary on Chatterjee Et Al. (2018): A Corrected Framework for Group Sparsity in Zero‐Inflated Negative Binomial Models — Himel Mallick, Emmanuel Ogundimu, et al. · Statistics in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS