Research sense: Incorporating animals’ sensory capacities in animal care and study design

No systematic procedures exist to ensure that differences in animal sensory capacities are accounted for in experimental design and ethical review processes. This oversight can compromise both scientific validity and animal welfare. This review presents three practical methodologies to address this gap: incorporation of specialist expertise through consultation frameworks, voluntary certification schemes modeled on Open Science practices, and mandatory sensory capacity review integrated into existing ethics committee processes. We provide a concrete tool-a sensory modality survey-that can be implemented by institutional review committees to evaluate sensory considerations in research proposals systematically. These approaches align with the 3Rs principles by enhancing experimental refinement and potentially reducing animal use through improved study design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Animals
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772251385784
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research sense: Incorporating animals’ sensory capacities in animal care and study design

Bob Fischer, Mal Graham
Laboratory Animals
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Research sense: Incorporating animals’ sensory capacities in animal care and study design

Bob Fischer, Mal Graham
article en

Abstract

No systematic procedures exist to ensure that differences in animal sensory capacities are accounted for in experimental design and ethical review processes. This oversight can compromise both scientific validity and animal welfare. This review presents three practical methodologies to address this gap: incorporation of specialist expertise through consultation frameworks, voluntary certification schemes modeled on Open Science practices, and mandatory sensory capacity review integrated into existing ethics committee processes. We provide a concrete tool-a sensory modality survey-that can be implemented by institutional review committees to evaluate sensory considerations in research proposals systematically. These approaches align with the 3Rs principles by enhancing experimental refinement and potentially reducing animal use through improved study design.

Laboratory Animals
Texas State University (US), MNGI Digestive Health (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research sense: Incorporating animals’ sensory capacities in animal care and study design — Bob Fischer, Mal Graham · Laboratory Animals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS