Research sense: Incorporating animals’ sensory capacities in animal care and study design
No systematic procedures exist to ensure that differences in animal sensory capacities are accounted for in experimental design and ethical review processes. This oversight can compromise both scientific validity and animal welfare. This review presents three practical methodologies to address this gap: incorporation of specialist expertise through consultation frameworks, voluntary certification schemes modeled on Open Science practices, and mandatory sensory capacity review integrated into existing ethics committee processes. We provide a concrete tool-a sensory modality survey-that can be implemented by institutional review committees to evaluate sensory considerations in research proposals systematically. These approaches align with the 3Rs principles by enhancing experimental refinement and potentially reducing animal use through improved study design.
Authors
- Bob Fischer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-393X)
- Mal Graham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-5361)
Institutions
- Texas State University (US)
- MNGI Digestive Health (US)
- New York University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Laboratory Animals
- Published
- 2025-12-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772251385784
- Primary Topic
- Animal testing and alternatives
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00