Intimate partner violence and witnessing domestic violence: medico-legal implications, standards of proof, and institutional duties

This editorial accompanies the comprehensive review on Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and Witnessing Domestic Violence (WDV) published in this issue, with a focus on their medico-legal implications. It highlights how clinical consequences - ranging from chronic pain syndromes to psychiatric sequelae - must be translated into legally cognizable injuries through rigorous forensic evaluation. Particular attention is given to the recognition of children as 'primary victims' of WDV, the evidentiary value of medical documentation, the duties of healthcare professionals under mandatory reporting frameworks, and the quantification of psychological harm in civil compensation. The discussion also considers institutional liability for omissions, the reciprocal expectations between clinicians and courts, and the research priorities necessary to align public health and justice. Ultimately, IPV and WDV must be understood as violations of fundamental rights that demand integration of clinical expertise, forensic rigor, and legal accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rivista di psichiatria
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1708/4617.46257
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intimate partner violence and witnessing domestic violence: medico-legal implications, standards of proof, and institutional duties

Andrea Cioffi
Rivista di psichiatria
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Intimate partner violence and witnessing domestic violence: medico-legal implications, standards of proof, and institutional duties

Andrea Cioffi
article en

Abstract

This editorial accompanies the comprehensive review on Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and Witnessing Domestic Violence (WDV) published in this issue, with a focus on their medico-legal implications. It highlights how clinical consequences - ranging from chronic pain syndromes to psychiatric sequelae - must be translated into legally cognizable injuries through rigorous forensic evaluation. Particular attention is given to the recognition of children as 'primary victims' of WDV, the evidentiary value of medical documentation, the duties of healthcare professionals under mandatory reporting frameworks, and the quantification of psychological harm in civil compensation. The discussion also considers institutional liability for omissions, the reciprocal expectations between clinicians and courts, and the research priorities necessary to align public health and justice. Ultimately, IPV and WDV must be understood as violations of fundamental rights that demand integration of clinical expertise, forensic rigor, and legal accountability.

Rivista di psichiatriaVol. 60(6)
University of Foggia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.