Contextualizing Population Genetic Models of Sex‐Biased Migration and Admixture

Models of sex-biased migration or admixture in human history often use sex itself as the factor that controls the probability that an individual migrates. This modeling strategy unites work across a large range of times and populations, from Neanderthal archaic introgression to the consequences of colonialism. However, inferring the degree of sex bias in a migration event from a general model relies on the assumption that two equally sex-biased events should leave equivalent signals, on average, in the genome. We apply a contextualist view of sex to highlight the possible effects of intrasexual variation on the inference of sex-biased migration when individuals within a sex category are not exchangeable. Using simulations, we demonstrate that demographically identical migration events can leave distinguishable patterns of ancestry in the genome and argue that modeling intrasexual variation can be an important step in capturing the signals of sex-biased migration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Human Biology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.70183
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextualizing Population Genetic Models of Sex‐Biased Migration and Admixture

Miriam Miyagi, Sarah S. Richardson, Emilia Huerta‐Sánchez
1 citations
American Journal of Human Biology
Forensic and Genetic Research
1.82
article

Contextualizing Population Genetic Models of Sex‐Biased Migration and Admixture

Miriam Miyagi, Sarah S. Richardson, Emilia Huerta‐Sánchez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Models of sex-biased migration or admixture in human history often use sex itself as the factor that controls the probability that an individual migrates. This modeling strategy unites work across a large range of times and populations, from Neanderthal archaic introgression to the consequences of colonialism. However, inferring the degree of sex bias in a migration event from a general model relies on the assumption that two equally sex-biased events should leave equivalent signals, on average, in the genome. We apply a contextualist view of sex to highlight the possible effects of intrasexual variation on the inference of sex-biased migration when individuals within a sex category are not exchangeable. Using simulations, we demonstrate that demographically identical migration events can leave distinguishable patterns of ancestry in the genome and argue that modeling intrasexual variation can be an important step in capturing the signals of sex-biased migration.

American Journal of Human BiologyVol. 37(12)
Harvard University (US), Brown University (US), Gender Studies (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Forensic and Genetic Research
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contextualizing Population Genetic Models of Sex‐Biased Migration and Admixture — Miriam Miyagi, Sarah S. Richardson, et al. · American Journal of Human Biology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS