Strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction analysis of TEVAR with double-branched endograft for non-A non-B aortic dissection: a patient-specific case study

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with branched devices has shown its promise in the treatment of complex thoracic aortic pathologies such as chronic aortic dissection involving the aortic arch. Understanding the short-term and long-term biomechanical changes remains essential for the prediction of possible adverse events and optimising post-operative patient care. This study presents a patient-specific haemodynamic and biomechanical evaluation of a branched TEVAR device by performing two-way fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation. The geometric model was reconstructed from the computed tomography angiography scan, and the additional branch configurations were constructed based on the measured orientation and device-specific dimensions. The native aortic wall was modelled as an anisotropic hyperelastic material, and strongly coupled FSI simulations were conducted with three-dimensional velocity profiles at the inlet and Windkessel boundary conditions at the outlets. Our FSI simulation results captured physiologically realistic flow dynamics, wall shear stress distributions, and displacement forces (up to 14.95 N), revealing both favourable outcomes and regions of potential thrombotic risk. In particular, low wall shear stress (< 0.4 Pa) and high relative residence time (> 15 Pa<sup>-1</sup>) were observed in the left common carotid artery branch, correlating with thrombus formation observed in a follow-up scan, whereas such regions were underestimated by the rigid-wall computational fluid dynamics simulation. Wall stress analysis revealed peak von Mises stresses exceeding 600 kPa at the proximal and distal landing zones of the stent-graft due to compliance mismatch. These findings underscore the potential value of incorporating wall compliance into the computational workflow for post-TEVAR evaluation, offering more accurate prediction of adverse events and informing patient-specific long-term monitoring strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanics
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.113126
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction analysis of TEVAR with double-branched endograft for non-A non-B aortic dissection: a patient-specific case study

Sandro Lepidi, Xiao Yun Xu, Mario D’Oria, Binghuan Li et al.
1 citations
Journal of Biomechanics
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
1.52
article

Strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction analysis of TEVAR with double-branched endograft for non-A non-B aortic dissection: a patient-specific case study

Sandro Lepidi, Xiao Yun Xu, Mario D’Oria, Binghuan Li, Yu Zhu, Kaihong Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with branched devices has shown its promise in the treatment of complex thoracic aortic pathologies such as chronic aortic dissection involving the aortic arch. Understanding the short-term and long-term biomechanical changes remains essential for the prediction of possible adverse events and optimising post-operative patient care. This study presents a patient-specific haemodynamic and biomechanical evaluation of a branched TEVAR device by performing two-way fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation. The geometric model was reconstructed from the computed tomography angiography scan, and the additional branch configurations were constructed based on the measured orientation and device-specific dimensions. The native aortic wall was modelled as an anisotropic hyperelastic material, and strongly coupled FSI simulations were conducted with three-dimensional velocity profiles at the inlet and Windkessel boundary conditions at the outlets. Our FSI simulation results captured physiologically realistic flow dynamics, wall shear stress distributions, and displacement forces (up to 14.95 N), revealing both favourable outcomes and regions of potential thrombotic risk. In particular, low wall shear stress (< 0.4 Pa) and high relative residence time (> 15 Pa<sup>-1</sup>) were observed in the left common carotid artery branch, correlating with thrombus formation observed in a follow-up scan, whereas such regions were underestimated by the rigid-wall computational fluid dynamics simulation. Wall stress analysis revealed peak von Mises stresses exceeding 600 kPa at the proximal and distal landing zones of the stent-graft due to compliance mismatch. These findings underscore the potential value of incorporating wall compliance into the computational workflow for post-TEVAR evaluation, offering more accurate prediction of adverse events and informing patient-specific long-term monitoring strategies.

Journal of BiomechanicsVol. 195
University of Trieste (IT), Lung Institute (US), NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.