Impact of age on functional recovery following hospital-based rehabilitation in older adults

With a rapidly aging population, accurately predicting rehabilitation outcomes in older adults is increasingly important. As the impact of age on recovery trajectories in geriatric rehabilitation remains unclear, we conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the effect of older age on improvements in rehabilitation functional outcomes. We included 158 patients (median age: 84 years; IQR: 77.0-88.0) admitted in 2024 to a geriatric rehabilitation unit. Functional status was assessed at admission and discharge using the Modified Barthel Index (autonomy), Hendrich II Fall Risk Model (fall risk), and Tinetti Scale (balance and gait). Patients were stratified into age tertiles and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable linear regression models evaluated the independent associations of age, sex, and frailty index with functional outcomes. Comparisons of changes in functional outcomes between the youngest (T1) and oldest (T3) age tertiles were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Older age was associated with worse baseline functional status, reflected by lower Barthel and Tinetti scores and higher Hendrich II scores. However, in multivariable models, frailty index-but not chronological age-was the strongest independent predictor of all functional outcomes, including Barthel (β = -89.9, p < 0.001), Tinetti (β = -39.9, p < 0.001), and Hendrich II (β = 6.8, p < 0.001). Both younger and older patients achieved significant functional gains, particularly in mobility, whereas improvements in autonomy and fall risk were more limited among the oldest individuals. In conclusion, chronological age was associated with poorer baseline performance but did not impair motor recovery. Frailty, rather than age itself, emerged as the key determinant of rehabilitation outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of integrating standardized frailty assessments to guide rehabilitation strategies and promote equitable access to multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04219-4
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of age on functional recovery following hospital-based rehabilitation in older adults

S. Iacono, M. Froldi, Paolo Fiorina, Nadia Antoniotti et al.
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Impact of age on functional recovery following hospital-based rehabilitation in older adults

S. Iacono, M. Froldi, Paolo Fiorina, Nadia Antoniotti, Sonia Baruffi, Calogero Malfitano, Tiziano Nestola, Alessandra Petrelli, Carlo Mainetti, Antonella Ferrari, Francesco Dentali, Sarah Catarame, Francesca Giani, Giovanna Esposti, Gessica Nicodemi
article en

Abstract

With a rapidly aging population, accurately predicting rehabilitation outcomes in older adults is increasingly important. As the impact of age on recovery trajectories in geriatric rehabilitation remains unclear, we conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the effect of older age on improvements in rehabilitation functional outcomes. We included 158 patients (median age: 84 years; IQR: 77.0-88.0) admitted in 2024 to a geriatric rehabilitation unit. Functional status was assessed at admission and discharge using the Modified Barthel Index (autonomy), Hendrich II Fall Risk Model (fall risk), and Tinetti Scale (balance and gait). Patients were stratified into age tertiles and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable linear regression models evaluated the independent associations of age, sex, and frailty index with functional outcomes. Comparisons of changes in functional outcomes between the youngest (T1) and oldest (T3) age tertiles were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Older age was associated with worse baseline functional status, reflected by lower Barthel and Tinetti scores and higher Hendrich II scores. However, in multivariable models, frailty index-but not chronological age-was the strongest independent predictor of all functional outcomes, including Barthel (β = -89.9, p < 0.001), Tinetti (β = -39.9, p < 0.001), and Hendrich II (β = 6.8, p < 0.001). Both younger and older patients achieved significant functional gains, particularly in mobility, whereas improvements in autonomy and fall risk were more limited among the oldest individuals. In conclusion, chronological age was associated with poorer baseline performance but did not impair motor recovery. Frailty, rather than age itself, emerged as the key determinant of rehabilitation outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of integrating standardized frailty assessments to guide rehabilitation strategies and promote equitable access to multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older adults.

Internal and Emergency Medicine
University of Insubria (IT), Boston Children's Hospital (US), University of Milan (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Alessandria (IT), Università degli Studi Internazionali di Roma (IT), Boston Children's Museum (US), ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.