Development and validation of identification models for aortic dissection and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department

Aortic dissection (AD) and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are critical illnesses whose prompt identification within the emergency department is challenging. This study aimed to establish rapid discrimination models to differentiate between these conditions. Patients of the training set and validation set were collected from January 2020 to June 2023. All patients used their final diagnosis. Discriminant models were constructed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Based on the results of the two models, two web calculators were developed. A total of 1314 patients were included in the study, with 997 patients (399 AD patients and 598 NSTE-ACS patients) and 317 patients (132 AD patients and 185 NSTE-ACS patients) in the training and validation sets, respectively. The semi-model consisted of six clinical characteristics (age, heart rate, pulse pressure, temperature, hypertension, diabetes), with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.792 and 0.823 in the training and validation sets. The whole-model included five clinical characteristics (age, pulse pressure, hypertension, diabetes) and two point-of-care test data (high sensitivity troponin I, D-dimer). It had a higher predictive value compared to the semi-model, with AUCs of 0.973 and 0.980 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Given the optimal cutoff point, the semi-model demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.716 and a specificity of 0.734, whereas the whole-model displayed a sensitivity of 0.930 and a specificity of 0.946. Both identification models can be used as reliable tools for rapidly identifying AD and NSTE-ACS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31275-9
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of identification models for aortic dissection and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department

Haojie Chen, Rubing Liang, Songsen Li, Zhishuai Li et al.
Scientific Reports
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Development and validation of identification models for aortic dissection and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department

Haojie Chen, Rubing Liang, Songsen Li, Zhishuai Li, Yuefei Jin, Yunfei Gu, Xing Li, Hao Wang, Yaxin Ban
article en

Abstract

Aortic dissection (AD) and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are critical illnesses whose prompt identification within the emergency department is challenging. This study aimed to establish rapid discrimination models to differentiate between these conditions. Patients of the training set and validation set were collected from January 2020 to June 2023. All patients used their final diagnosis. Discriminant models were constructed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Based on the results of the two models, two web calculators were developed. A total of 1314 patients were included in the study, with 997 patients (399 AD patients and 598 NSTE-ACS patients) and 317 patients (132 AD patients and 185 NSTE-ACS patients) in the training and validation sets, respectively. The semi-model consisted of six clinical characteristics (age, heart rate, pulse pressure, temperature, hypertension, diabetes), with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.792 and 0.823 in the training and validation sets. The whole-model included five clinical characteristics (age, pulse pressure, hypertension, diabetes) and two point-of-care test data (high sensitivity troponin I, D-dimer). It had a higher predictive value compared to the semi-model, with AUCs of 0.973 and 0.980 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Given the optimal cutoff point, the semi-model demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.716 and a specificity of 0.734, whereas the whole-model displayed a sensitivity of 0.930 and a specificity of 0.946. Both identification models can be used as reliable tools for rapidly identifying AD and NSTE-ACS.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
People's Liberation Army No. 150 Hospital (CN), Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University (CN), Xinxiang Central Hospital (CN), Xinxiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.