Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) in a multisite study of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease

Four hundred seventy-five participants from 16 US sites underwent tablet-based cognitive assessment. Digital tests assessed executive function and visuospatial abilities. Digital tests correlated with traditional pen-and-paper cognitive tests. Match (test of executive function) differentiated clinical groups. Digital tests were associated with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) status and regional tau PET patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71012
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) in a multisite study of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease

Konstantinos Chiotis, J. Zhang, Alexandra Touroutoglou, Michael Brickhouse et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) in a multisite study of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease

Konstantinos Chiotis, J. Zhang, Alexandra Touroutoglou, Michael Brickhouse, Lawrence S. Honig, Clifford R. Jack, Alireza Atri, Ranjani P. Shankar, Piyush Maiti, Renaud La Joie, Alexander Taurone, Joel H. Kramer, Joseph C. Masdeu, Erik S. Musiek, Ian Grant, Liana G. Apostolova, Paul S. S Aisen, David A. Wolk, Erik C. B. Johnson, Prashanthi Vemuri, Chiadi U. Onyike, Elena Tsoy, Robert Koeppe, Gil Dan Rabinovici, Dustin B. Hammers, Kyle Womack, Sandra Rocha, Laurel Beckett, Sharon J. Sha, Emily Rogalskı, Isabel Elaine Allen, Walter A. Kukull, Gregory Scott Day, David Thomas Jones, Kelly Nudelman, Ganna Blazhenets, David A. Clark, Wepnyu Yembe Njamnshi, Marcus A. Lawson, Mario F. Mendez, Ani Eloyan, Katherine L. Possin, Ranjan Duara, Bradford Clark Dickerson, Raymond Scott Turner, Alinda Amuiri, Thomas S. Wingo, Marı́a C. Carrillo, Arthur W. Toga, Neill R. Graff‐Radford, Kala Kirby, Steven Salloway, Maryanne Thangarajah, Meghan Riddle
article en

Abstract

Four hundred seventy-five participants from 16 US sites underwent tablet-based cognitive assessment. Digital tests assessed executive function and visuospatial abilities. Digital tests correlated with traditional pen-and-paper cognitive tests. Match (test of executive function) differentiated clinical groups. Digital tests were associated with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) status and regional tau PET patterns.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(12)
Northwestern University (US), University of Southern California (US), Alzheimer's Association (US), Autism Research Institute (US), Houston Methodist (US), Rhode Island Department of Health (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Georgetown University (US), University of Washington (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Cornell University (US), Brown University (US), University of Michigan (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Jacksonville College (US), University of California System (US), University of Chicago (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Mount Sinai Medical Center (US), University Memory and Aging Center (US), Methodist Hospital (US), Ministry of Public Health (CM), Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Global Brain Health Institute (US), University of Lomé (TG), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of California, Davis (US), Stanford University (US)
National Institutes of Health, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.