Comparable recurrence risk for <scp>MRI</scp> ‐detected Gleason Grade Group (GG) <scp>2</scp> and systematic biopsy‐detected <scp>GG1</scp> prostate cancer

Men diagnosed with GG2 PCa based on MRI-targeted biopsy had a similar risk of recurrence after treatment compared to men with GG1 disease diagnosed using systematic biopsy, although they were more likely to undergo curative treatment. These findings suggest that at least a portion of the apparent increase in GG2 diagnoses in the MRI era may reflect reclassification rather than more aggressive disease. Improved risk stratification is needed to identify which men with MRI-era GG2 cancer may be suitable for active surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70109
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparable recurrence risk for MRI ‐detected Gleason Grade Group (GG) 2 and systematic biopsy‐detected GG1 prostate cancer

Joona Pohjonen, Andrew M. Erickson, Abderrahim-Oussama Batouche, Antti Rannikko et al.
British Journal of Urology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparable recurrence risk for MRI ‐detected Gleason Grade Group (GG) 2 and systematic biopsy‐detected GG1 prostate cancer

Joona Pohjonen, Andrew M. Erickson, Abderrahim-Oussama Batouche, Antti Rannikko, Tuomas Mirtti, Timo‐Pekka Lehto, Teemu D. Laajala, Eugen Czeizler, Tolou Shadbahr
article en

Abstract

Men diagnosed with GG2 PCa based on MRI-targeted biopsy had a similar risk of recurrence after treatment compared to men with GG1 disease diagnosed using systematic biopsy, although they were more likely to undergo curative treatment. These findings suggest that at least a portion of the apparent increase in GG2 diagnoses in the MRI era may reflect reclassification rather than more aggressive disease. Improved risk stratification is needed to identify which men with MRI-era GG2 cancer may be suitable for active surveillance.

British Journal of UrologyVol. 137(3)
University of Helsinki (FI), Emory University (US), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), University of Oxford (GB), Cancer Society of Finland (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparable recurrence risk for <scp>MRI</scp> ‐detected Gleason Grade Group (GG) <scp>2</scp> and systematic biopsy‐detected <scp>GG1</scp> prostate cancer — Joona Pohjonen, Andrew M. Erickson, et al. · British Journal of Urology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS