The Effect of Co/TiN Interfaces on Co Interconnect Resistivity

Electron transport measurements on Co/TiN multilayers are employed to explore the effect of TiN layers on Co resistivity. For this, 50 nm thick multilayer stacks containing N = 1–10 individual Co layers that are separated by 1 nm thick TiN layers are sputter deposited on SiO2/Si(001) substrates at 400 °C. X-ray diffraction and reflectivity measurements indicate a tendency for a 0001 preferred orientation, an X-ray coherence length of 13 nm that is nearly independent of N, and an interfacial roughness that increases with N. The in-plane multilayer resistivity ρ increases with increasing N = 1–10, from ρ = 14.4 to 36.6 µΩ-cm at room temperature and from ρ = 11.2 to 19.4 µΩ-cm at 77 K. This increase is due to a combination of increased electron scattering at interfaces and grain boundaries, as quantified using a combined Fuchs–Sondheimer and Mayadas–Shatzkes model. The analysis indicates that a decreasing thickness of the individual Co layers dCo from 50 to 5 nm causes not only an increasing resistivity contribution from Co/TiN interface scattering (from 9 to 88% with respect to the room-temperature bulk resistivity) but also an increasing (39 to 154%) grain boundary scattering contribution, which exacerbates the resistivity penalty due to the TiN liner. These results are supported by Co/TiN bilayer and trilayer structures deposited on Al2O3 (0001) at 600 °C. Interfacial intermixing causes Co2Ti and Co3Ti alloy phase formation, an increase in the contact resistance, a degradation of the Co crystalline quality, and a 2.3× higher resistivity for Co deposited on TiN than Co directly deposited on Al2O3(0001). The overall results show that TiN liners cause a dramatic increase in Co interconnects due to diffuse surface scattering, interfacial intermixing/roughness, and Co grain renucleation at Co/TiN interfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surfaces
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/surfaces8040089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Copper Interconnects and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Co/TiN Interfaces on Co Interconnect Resistivity

Daniel Gall, S.M. Mujibur Rahman, Poyen Shen, Daniel M. Syracuse
1 citations
Surfaces
Copper Interconnects and Reliability
0.43
article

The Effect of Co/TiN Interfaces on Co Interconnect Resistivity

Daniel Gall, S.M. Mujibur Rahman, Poyen Shen, Daniel M. Syracuse
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Electron transport measurements on Co/TiN multilayers are employed to explore the effect of TiN layers on Co resistivity. For this, 50 nm thick multilayer stacks containing N = 1–10 individual Co layers that are separated by 1 nm thick TiN layers are sputter deposited on SiO2/Si(001) substrates at 400 °C. X-ray diffraction and reflectivity measurements indicate a tendency for a 0001 preferred orientation, an X-ray coherence length of 13 nm that is nearly independent of N, and an interfacial roughness that increases with N. The in-plane multilayer resistivity ρ increases with increasing N = 1–10, from ρ = 14.4 to 36.6 µΩ-cm at room temperature and from ρ = 11.2 to 19.4 µΩ-cm at 77 K. This increase is due to a combination of increased electron scattering at interfaces and grain boundaries, as quantified using a combined Fuchs–Sondheimer and Mayadas–Shatzkes model. The analysis indicates that a decreasing thickness of the individual Co layers dCo from 50 to 5 nm causes not only an increasing resistivity contribution from Co/TiN interface scattering (from 9 to 88% with respect to the room-temperature bulk resistivity) but also an increasing (39 to 154%) grain boundary scattering contribution, which exacerbates the resistivity penalty due to the TiN liner. These results are supported by Co/TiN bilayer and trilayer structures deposited on Al2O3 (0001) at 600 °C. Interfacial intermixing causes Co2Ti and Co3Ti alloy phase formation, an increase in the contact resistance, a degradation of the Co crystalline quality, and a 2.3× higher resistivity for Co deposited on TiN than Co directly deposited on Al2O3(0001). The overall results show that TiN liners cause a dramatic increase in Co interconnects due to diffuse surface scattering, interfacial intermixing/roughness, and Co grain renucleation at Co/TiN interfaces.

SurfacesVol. 8(4)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
National Science Foundation, Semiconductor Research Corporation, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Copper Interconnects and Reliability
0.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.