The Impact of Surgical Approach on Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Postero-Lateral Versus Direct Lateral Approaches

<b>Background</b>: Femoral neck fractures in the elderly often necessitate hemiarthroplasty, but the optimal surgical approach remains a highly debated topic. The postero-lateral and direct lateral approaches are commonly employed, each with benefits and drawbacks. Despite their widespread use, robust, long-term comparative studies on definitive outcomes, including pain, functional recovery, and complication rates, are notably lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to address this critical gap by meticulously comparing these approaches with long-term follow-up. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic literature search was performed, including only comparative studies with a minimum 1-year follow-up. A meta-analysis was performed for the primary outcome measures: operative time, dislocations, infections, perioperative fractures and reoperations. Secondary outcomes included a qualitative synthesis of patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, pain, and satisfaction). Methodological quality was assessed using RoB 2.0 for randomized controlled trials and MINORS criteria for cohort studies. <b>Results</b>: Our meta-analysis provides robust quantitative evidence. The direct lateral approach is associated with a significantly lower risk of post-operative dislocations (I<sup>2</sup> = 58%; OR = 2.86, 95% CI: 2.53 to 3.22; <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and a significantly lower rate of reoperation (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.40; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) compared to postero-lateral approach. Operative time, infection, and perioperative fracture rates were found to be statistically comparable. However, patient-reported outcomes yielded inconsistent results across studies, often becoming non-significant after adjusting for confounders. <b>Conclusions</b>: This meta-analysis shows that the direct lateral approach is associated with lower rates of dislocation and reoperation compared with the postero-lateral approach, while patient-reported outcomes remain variable across studies. Further high-quality comparative trials are needed to confirm these associations and guide surgical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248846
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Surgical Approach on Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Postero-Lateral Versus Direct Lateral Approaches

Caterina Capperucci, Francesco Rosario Parisi, Gianmarco Marcello, Augusto Ferrini et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

The Impact of Surgical Approach on Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Postero-Lateral Versus Direct Lateral Approaches

Caterina Capperucci, Francesco Rosario Parisi, Gianmarco Marcello, Augusto Ferrini, Lorenzo Alirio Diaz Balzani, Emanuele Zappalà, A Monaco, Rocco Papalia, Biagio Zampogna, Erika Albo, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Femoral neck fractures in the elderly often necessitate hemiarthroplasty, but the optimal surgical approach remains a highly debated topic. The postero-lateral and direct lateral approaches are commonly employed, each with benefits and drawbacks. Despite their widespread use, robust, long-term comparative studies on definitive outcomes, including pain, functional recovery, and complication rates, are notably lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to address this critical gap by meticulously comparing these approaches with long-term follow-up. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic literature search was performed, including only comparative studies with a minimum 1-year follow-up. A meta-analysis was performed for the primary outcome measures: operative time, dislocations, infections, perioperative fractures and reoperations. Secondary outcomes included a qualitative synthesis of patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, pain, and satisfaction). Methodological quality was assessed using RoB 2.0 for randomized controlled trials and MINORS criteria for cohort studies. <b>Results</b>: Our meta-analysis provides robust quantitative evidence. The direct lateral approach is associated with a significantly lower risk of post-operative dislocations (I<sup>2</sup> = 58%; OR = 2.86, 95% CI: 2.53 to 3.22; <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and a significantly lower rate of reoperation (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.40; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) compared to postero-lateral approach. Operative time, infection, and perioperative fracture rates were found to be statistically comparable. However, patient-reported outcomes yielded inconsistent results across studies, often becoming non-significant after adjusting for confounders. <b>Conclusions</b>: This meta-analysis shows that the direct lateral approach is associated with lower rates of dislocation and reoperation compared with the postero-lateral approach, while patient-reported outcomes remain variable across studies. Further high-quality comparative trials are needed to confirm these associations and guide surgical decision-making.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(24)
University of Messina (IT), Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), CTO Hospital (IT), National Cancer Institute (MY), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "G. Martino" (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.