Enhanced Benefits of Prone Positioning Combined with Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Patients with COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

<b>Background:</b> Early reports highlighted unique features of COVID-19-associated ARDS. The combination of prone position (PP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing oxygenation and improving outcomes in patients with ARDS, but it remains unknown whether there is a difference between COVID-19 ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS. <b>Method:</b> This study is a secondary analysis of a previously conducted randomized controlled trial. Patients with moderate to severe ARDS were consecutively enrolled during the study period (June-December 2023). After initiation of PP, patients received a PEEP-induced LRM followed by 12 h of daily PP. The interventions were repeated at least three times over the subsequent 3 days. Clinical outcomes, respiratory mechanics, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) results were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-eight patients were included in the final analysis, half of whom were infected with COVID-19 (50%). The PEEP-induced LRM led to greater improvement in oxygenation among COVID-19 ARDS than non-COVID-19 ARDS (∆PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio 90.5 mmHg vs. 65.5 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Based on EIT measurement, compared with the non-COVID-19 ARDS group, PEEP-induced LRM resulted in a greater increase in ventilation distribution, mainly in the dorsal regions of interest 4 (ROI 4) ventilation distribution (∆ROI4 4.5% vs. 1.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and in dorsal regional ventilation (∆dorsal regional ventilation 10.0% vs. 5.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.04) in the COVID-19 ARDS group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared to typical ARDS, PEEP-induced LRM combined with PP may be more effective in enhancing oxygenation in COVID-19-related ARDS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248822
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced Benefits of Prone Positioning Combined with Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Patients with COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Lan Lan, Faping Wang, Ping Li, Fengming Luo et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Enhanced Benefits of Prone Positioning Combined with Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Patients with COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Lan Lan, Faping Wang, Ping Li, Fengming Luo, Yubei Zhou, Yuenan Ni
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Early reports highlighted unique features of COVID-19-associated ARDS. The combination of prone position (PP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing oxygenation and improving outcomes in patients with ARDS, but it remains unknown whether there is a difference between COVID-19 ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS. <b>Method:</b> This study is a secondary analysis of a previously conducted randomized controlled trial. Patients with moderate to severe ARDS were consecutively enrolled during the study period (June-December 2023). After initiation of PP, patients received a PEEP-induced LRM followed by 12 h of daily PP. The interventions were repeated at least three times over the subsequent 3 days. Clinical outcomes, respiratory mechanics, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) results were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-eight patients were included in the final analysis, half of whom were infected with COVID-19 (50%). The PEEP-induced LRM led to greater improvement in oxygenation among COVID-19 ARDS than non-COVID-19 ARDS (∆PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio 90.5 mmHg vs. 65.5 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Based on EIT measurement, compared with the non-COVID-19 ARDS group, PEEP-induced LRM resulted in a greater increase in ventilation distribution, mainly in the dorsal regions of interest 4 (ROI 4) ventilation distribution (∆ROI4 4.5% vs. 1.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and in dorsal regional ventilation (∆dorsal regional ventilation 10.0% vs. 5.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.04) in the COVID-19 ARDS group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared to typical ARDS, PEEP-induced LRM combined with PP may be more effective in enhancing oxygenation in COVID-19-related ARDS.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(24)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.