“We Don’t Want You Here”: A Critical Examination of Staring, Disability, and the Inaccessible Environment

Disability scholars generally categorize staring as a stigmatizing action that has negative psychosocial impacts on disabled people. Yet, interestingly, staring is also oftentimes understood as natural, understandable, and is even encouraged in different contexts. In this paper, I first articulate the diverse ways staring is experienced and conceptualized by drawing from general sociological, queer, and disability theories, and I demonstrate that staring itself is a value-neutral action. I argue that staring is experienced particularly negatively by disabled communities because (1) staring that occurs within inaccessible environments reinforces societal sentiments that disabled individuals are unwanted and unvalued, and (2) disabled individuals often lack control over whether and how they are stared at; thus, when staring occurs in a physically inaccessible context, staring perpetuates a loss of control over social experiences. I conclude by articulating how participatory planning as an alternative approach to inclusive design can attenuate the harmful impacts staring has on disabled individuals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2025.a978175
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We Don’t Want You Here”: A Critical Examination of Staring, Disability, and the Inaccessible Environment

Natalie Hardy
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Disability Rights and Representation
article

“We Don’t Want You Here”: A Critical Examination of Staring, Disability, and the Inaccessible Environment

Natalie Hardy
article en

Abstract

Disability scholars generally categorize staring as a stigmatizing action that has negative psychosocial impacts on disabled people. Yet, interestingly, staring is also oftentimes understood as natural, understandable, and is even encouraged in different contexts. In this paper, I first articulate the diverse ways staring is experienced and conceptualized by drawing from general sociological, queer, and disability theories, and I demonstrate that staring itself is a value-neutral action. I argue that staring is experienced particularly negatively by disabled communities because (1) staring that occurs within inaccessible environments reinforces societal sentiments that disabled individuals are unwanted and unvalued, and (2) disabled individuals often lack control over whether and how they are stared at; thus, when staring occurs in a physically inaccessible context, staring perpetuates a loss of control over social experiences. I conclude by articulating how participatory planning as an alternative approach to inclusive design can attenuate the harmful impacts staring has on disabled individuals.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journalVol. 35(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.