10125-ANGI-1 Comparative analyses of Annexin A2 expression and prognosis during bevacizumab therapy in glioblastoma between effectiveness and refractoriness

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) has a dismal prognosis, with limited survival benefit from bevacizumab (Bev). Annexin A2 (ANXA2), a molecule involved in angiogenesis and invasion, may play a key role in resistance mechanisms. The aim of the present study was to compare ANXA2 expression and clinical outcome in newly diagnosed GBM by Bev therapy. Methods We analyzed 65 samples from 33 patients with GBM, consisting of initial (Naïve Bev; n = 15), neoadjuvant Bev (NeoBev; n = 18), and recurrent tumors (Refractory Bev) including paired samples. Progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by stratification of ANXA2 expression quantitated by qPCR with comparison of MRI with or without contrast medium. Results In the Naïve Bev group, ANXA2 expression was not associated with clinical prognosis. Whereas in the NeoBev group, low level of ANXA2 expression revealed favorable PFS (p = 0.1062) and OS (p = 0.0025), suggesting that high ANXA2 levels at the naïve stage resulted in a rapid decrease of expression after NeoBev and providing simultaneous suppression of angiogenesis and invasion, leading to favorable prognosis. As for impact of cumulative Bev administrations stratified by treatment cycle count (<15 vs. ≥15 cycles), ANXA2 expression was significantly lower in patients with ≥ 15 cycles compared with those with <15 cycles (p = 0.0367). In particular, patients with lower expression in NeoBev group revealed prolongation of OS. T1Gd good responders showed a trend toward longer PFS (p = 0.1037), while T2/FLAIR poor responders also showed a similar trend (p = 0.0688). In addition, there were no significance between ANXA2 expression level and recurrent pattern on MRI in both of Naïve and NeoBev. Conclusion ANXA2 may reflect treatment-related imaging changes and be involved in both angiogenesis and invasion. These findings suggest that ANXA2 could provide not only as a prognostic factor but also as a predictive biomarker for response to neoadjuvant Bev therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf236.001
Primary Topic
S100 Proteins and Annexins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

10125-ANGI-1 Comparative analyses of Annexin A2 expression and prognosis during bevacizumab therapy in glioblastoma between effectiveness and refractoriness

Hikaru Sasaki, Ryota Tamura, Akihiko Teshigawara, Hitoshi Kawazoe et al.
Neuro-Oncology Advances
S100 Proteins and Annexins
article

10125-ANGI-1 Comparative analyses of Annexin A2 expression and prognosis during bevacizumab therapy in glioblastoma between effectiveness and refractoriness

Hikaru Sasaki, Ryota Tamura, Akihiko Teshigawara, Hitoshi Kawazoe, Kyoichi Tomoto, Hisakazu Ohtani, Masahiro Toda, Yuichi Murayama, Toshihide Tanaka, Jun Takei, Taketo Ezaki, Yohei Yamamoto, Keisuke Miyake, Yasuharu Akasaki
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) has a dismal prognosis, with limited survival benefit from bevacizumab (Bev). Annexin A2 (ANXA2), a molecule involved in angiogenesis and invasion, may play a key role in resistance mechanisms. The aim of the present study was to compare ANXA2 expression and clinical outcome in newly diagnosed GBM by Bev therapy. Methods We analyzed 65 samples from 33 patients with GBM, consisting of initial (Naïve Bev; n = 15), neoadjuvant Bev (NeoBev; n = 18), and recurrent tumors (Refractory Bev) including paired samples. Progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by stratification of ANXA2 expression quantitated by qPCR with comparison of MRI with or without contrast medium. Results In the Naïve Bev group, ANXA2 expression was not associated with clinical prognosis. Whereas in the NeoBev group, low level of ANXA2 expression revealed favorable PFS (p = 0.1062) and OS (p = 0.0025), suggesting that high ANXA2 levels at the naïve stage resulted in a rapid decrease of expression after NeoBev and providing simultaneous suppression of angiogenesis and invasion, leading to favorable prognosis. As for impact of cumulative Bev administrations stratified by treatment cycle count (<15 vs. ≥15 cycles), ANXA2 expression was significantly lower in patients with ≥ 15 cycles compared with those with <15 cycles (p = 0.0367). In particular, patients with lower expression in NeoBev group revealed prolongation of OS. T1Gd good responders showed a trend toward longer PFS (p = 0.1037), while T2/FLAIR poor responders also showed a similar trend (p = 0.0688). In addition, there were no significance between ANXA2 expression level and recurrent pattern on MRI in both of Naïve and NeoBev. Conclusion ANXA2 may reflect treatment-related imaging changes and be involved in both angiogenesis and invasion. These findings suggest that ANXA2 could provide not only as a prognostic factor but also as a predictive biomarker for response to neoadjuvant Bev therapy.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 7(Supplement_6)
Jikei University School of Medicine (JP), Kagawa University (JP), Keio University (JP), Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital (JP), Keio University Hospital (JP), The Jikei University Hospital (JP), Jikei University Kashiwa hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
S100 Proteins and Annexins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.