10011-CS-2 A Phase II basket trial evaluating the efficacy of tasurgratinib in patients with advanced solid tumors with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alteration (FORTUNE study)

Abstract Background Tasurgratinib is orally available selective FGFR1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in Japan for biliary tract cancer with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. We previously identified highly sensitive FGFR mutations to tasurgratinib using a high-throughput functional evaluation method (MANO method). We conducted a multicenter, single-arm investigator-initiated phase 2 basket trial to evaluate tasurgratinib in patients (pts) with FGFR alterations. Methods Pts with advanced solid tumors with FGFR gene alterations received tasurgratinib 140 mg QD. Pts were assigned to each group (Group A: FGFR1-3 fusion, Group B: FGFR1-3 mutation sensitive to tasurgratinib by MANO methods, Group C: FGFR1-3 activating mutation not in Group B or FGFR1/2 amplification, Group D: cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion pretreated with other FGFR inhibitors). The primary endpoint for Groups A-C was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR); Group D was exploratory cohort. Secondary endpoints included ORR by investigator assessment (IA), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. The threshold and expected response rates were 5% and 30%. Target enrollment for Group A, B, C and D were 10 pts, 15 pts, 15 pts and 1-5 pts, respectively. Results From June 2021 to December 2022, 46 pts enrolled and 41 comprised the full analysis set (A:10, B:15, C:15, D:1). Most common primary sites in each group were brain (A), biliary tract (B), and esophagus/stomach (C). ORRs by ICR were: A: 20.0% (90% CI 3.7-50.7, p = 0.0861), B: 20.0% (90% CI 5.7-44.0, p = 0.0362), and C: 6.7% (90% CI 0.3-27.9, p = 0.5367). ORRs by IA were: A: 20.0%, B: 40.0%, C: 13.3%, D: 0.0%. Median PFSs by IA were A: 2.5, B: 7.2, C: 2.2, D: 5.7 months. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions Primary endpoint was met in Group B. Tasurgratinib demonstrated clinical activity in pts with selected FGFR-mutated tumors. Additional recruitment of pts has been resumed. (jRCT2031210043).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf236.016
Primary Topic
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

10011-CS-2 A Phase II basket trial evaluating the efficacy of tasurgratinib in patients with advanced solid tumors with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alteration (FORTUNE study)

Kazumi Kurishita, Kenichi Nakamura, Ryo Sadachi, Hitomi Sumiyoshi Okuma et al.
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
article

10011-CS-2 A Phase II basket trial evaluating the efficacy of tasurgratinib in patients with advanced solid tumors with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alteration (FORTUNE study)

Kazumi Kurishita, Kenichi Nakamura, Ryo Sadachi, Hitomi Sumiyoshi Okuma, Kan Yonemori, Ichiro Kinoshita, Masanobu Takahashi, Shinji Kohsaka, Yohei Chiba, Kazuki Sudo, Masamichi Takahashi, Kenta Anjo, Junichi Matsubara, Masahiko Ichimura, K Tsuchihashi, Ryunosuke Machida
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Tasurgratinib is orally available selective FGFR1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in Japan for biliary tract cancer with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. We previously identified highly sensitive FGFR mutations to tasurgratinib using a high-throughput functional evaluation method (MANO method). We conducted a multicenter, single-arm investigator-initiated phase 2 basket trial to evaluate tasurgratinib in patients (pts) with FGFR alterations. Methods Pts with advanced solid tumors with FGFR gene alterations received tasurgratinib 140 mg QD. Pts were assigned to each group (Group A: FGFR1-3 fusion, Group B: FGFR1-3 mutation sensitive to tasurgratinib by MANO methods, Group C: FGFR1-3 activating mutation not in Group B or FGFR1/2 amplification, Group D: cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion pretreated with other FGFR inhibitors). The primary endpoint for Groups A-C was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR); Group D was exploratory cohort. Secondary endpoints included ORR by investigator assessment (IA), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. The threshold and expected response rates were 5% and 30%. Target enrollment for Group A, B, C and D were 10 pts, 15 pts, 15 pts and 1-5 pts, respectively. Results From June 2021 to December 2022, 46 pts enrolled and 41 comprised the full analysis set (A:10, B:15, C:15, D:1). Most common primary sites in each group were brain (A), biliary tract (B), and esophagus/stomach (C). ORRs by ICR were: A: 20.0% (90% CI 3.7-50.7, p = 0.0861), B: 20.0% (90% CI 5.7-44.0, p = 0.0362), and C: 6.7% (90% CI 0.3-27.9, p = 0.5367). ORRs by IA were: A: 20.0%, B: 40.0%, C: 13.3%, D: 0.0%. Median PFSs by IA were A: 2.5, B: 7.2, C: 2.2, D: 5.7 months. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions Primary endpoint was met in Group B. Tasurgratinib demonstrated clinical activity in pts with selected FGFR-mutated tumors. Additional recruitment of pts has been resumed. (jRCT2031210043).

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 7(Supplement_6)
Tokai University (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP), National Cancer Center (US), Kyushu University Hospital (JP), Tokai University Hospital (JP), National Clinical Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.