10197-CS-19 A global, randomized, double-blinded, Phase 3 study of Vorasidenib versus placebo in patients with adult-type diffuse glioma with an IDH1/2 mutation (INDIGO): updated data from the Japan subgroup analysis

Abstract Introduction Vorasidenib is an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (mIDH1/2). The Phase 3 INDIGO study (NCT04164901) evaluated vorasidenib in patients with mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma. After the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent review committee (BIRC) and key secondary endpoint of time to next intervention (TTNI) were met in the second interim analysis, the study was unblinded following committee recommendation. Herein, we present updated results for patients from Japan. Methods Patients with Grade 2 mIDH1/2 oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma (aged >12 years; Karnofsky Performance Status, >80; measurable non-enhancing disease; surgery as only prior treatment; no immediate need of chemoradiotherapy) were randomized 1:1 to vorasidenib 40 mg or placebo daily in 28-day cycles. After unblinding, all patients receiving placebo were able to transfer to vorasidenib. Results In Japan, 16 patients were randomized in INDIGO (placebo, n = 9; vorasidenib, n = 7), but study unblinding and crossover to vorasidenib occurred shortly after enrollment was completed, resulting in a short exposure to placebo. As of February 2025, median follow-up was 22.6 months (95% CI, 22.2, 23.5). All patients from Japan had received more than 1 dose of vorasidenib (oligodendroglioma, n = 10; astrocytoma, n = 6; median age, 44. 0 years) and 11 (68.3%) remained on treatment. Overall, four (25.0%) progression events per BIRC occurred and median PFS was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 19.3, NE). Three (18.8%) patients were censored from the PFS analysis as they had started a subsequent anticancer therapy. No new safety signals emerged; updated safety data will be presented. Conclusions Vorasidenib is an effective targeted therapy for patients with mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma in this Japanese patient population. Findings of this subgroup analysis remain consistent with the statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit of vorasidenib in the overall INDIGO study population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf236.033
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

10197-CS-19 A global, randomized, double-blinded, Phase 3 study of Vorasidenib versus placebo in patients with adult-type diffuse glioma with an IDH1/2 mutation (INDIGO): updated data from the Japan subgroup analysis

Shota Tanaka, Martin J. van den Bent, Yuichi Hirose, Akitake Mukasa et al.
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

10197-CS-19 A global, randomized, double-blinded, Phase 3 study of Vorasidenib versus placebo in patients with adult-type diffuse glioma with an IDH1/2 mutation (INDIGO): updated data from the Japan subgroup analysis

Shota Tanaka, Martin J. van den Bent, Yuichi Hirose, Akitake Mukasa, Ryuta Saito, Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Patrick Y. Wen, S. Lori, Yoshiki Arakawa, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Kazuhiko Sugiyama, Yoshitaka Narita, Hamidul Islam, Dan Zhao, Naoya Hashimoto, Pandya Susan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Vorasidenib is an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (mIDH1/2). The Phase 3 INDIGO study (NCT04164901) evaluated vorasidenib in patients with mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma. After the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent review committee (BIRC) and key secondary endpoint of time to next intervention (TTNI) were met in the second interim analysis, the study was unblinded following committee recommendation. Herein, we present updated results for patients from Japan. Methods Patients with Grade 2 mIDH1/2 oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma (aged >12 years; Karnofsky Performance Status, >80; measurable non-enhancing disease; surgery as only prior treatment; no immediate need of chemoradiotherapy) were randomized 1:1 to vorasidenib 40 mg or placebo daily in 28-day cycles. After unblinding, all patients receiving placebo were able to transfer to vorasidenib. Results In Japan, 16 patients were randomized in INDIGO (placebo, n = 9; vorasidenib, n = 7), but study unblinding and crossover to vorasidenib occurred shortly after enrollment was completed, resulting in a short exposure to placebo. As of February 2025, median follow-up was 22.6 months (95% CI, 22.2, 23.5). All patients from Japan had received more than 1 dose of vorasidenib (oligodendroglioma, n = 10; astrocytoma, n = 6; median age, 44. 0 years) and 11 (68.3%) remained on treatment. Overall, four (25.0%) progression events per BIRC occurred and median PFS was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 19.3, NE). Three (18.8%) patients were censored from the PFS analysis as they had started a subsequent anticancer therapy. No new safety signals emerged; updated safety data will be presented. Conclusions Vorasidenib is an effective targeted therapy for patients with mIDH1/2 diffuse glioma in this Japanese patient population. Findings of this subgroup analysis remain consistent with the statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit of vorasidenib in the overall INDIGO study population.

Neuro-Oncology AdvancesVol. 7(Supplement_6)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Kyoto University (JP), National Cancer Center (US), Nagoya University Hospital (JP), Okayama University Hospital (JP), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Kumamoto University Hospital (JP), Fujita Health University Hospital (JP), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP), University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP), Servier (France) (FR), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.