Clinical utility of gluten restriction in gastrointestinal disorders: Evidence, practice, and reappraisal of non-coeliac gluten sensitivity

Gluten-free diets (GFDs) are widely adopted for gastrointestinal complaints, yet evidence from well-controlled gluten challenge studies supporting gluten-specific symptom generation outside coeliac disease is inconsistent. Across trials, reproducible gluten-specific effects largely disappear once fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs) and expectation biases are controlled for, and meta-analyses report only modest, inconsistent symptom relief. Large nocebo responses and methodological heterogeneity undermine confidence in the construct of "non-coeliac gluten sensitivity". Re-interpreting gluten-attributed symptoms through the paradigm of disorders of gut-brain interaction provides a clinically coherent framework that integrates visceral hypersensitivity, cognitive-affective processes and sociocultural drivers. This review synthesises mechanistic and clinical data, distils methodological lessons and offers practical guidance on when, and how, to consider gluten restriction. A GFD should be a last resort, time-limited probe, supervised by a dietitian, and embedded within multidisciplinary care focused on individual symptom mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2025.102086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical utility of gluten restriction in gastrointestinal disorders: Evidence, practice, and reappraisal of non-coeliac gluten sensitivity

Jessica R. Biesiekierski
1 citations
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
Celiac Disease Research and Management
1.81
article

Clinical utility of gluten restriction in gastrointestinal disorders: Evidence, practice, and reappraisal of non-coeliac gluten sensitivity

Jessica R. Biesiekierski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gluten-free diets (GFDs) are widely adopted for gastrointestinal complaints, yet evidence from well-controlled gluten challenge studies supporting gluten-specific symptom generation outside coeliac disease is inconsistent. Across trials, reproducible gluten-specific effects largely disappear once fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs) and expectation biases are controlled for, and meta-analyses report only modest, inconsistent symptom relief. Large nocebo responses and methodological heterogeneity undermine confidence in the construct of "non-coeliac gluten sensitivity". Re-interpreting gluten-attributed symptoms through the paradigm of disorders of gut-brain interaction provides a clinically coherent framework that integrates visceral hypersensitivity, cognitive-affective processes and sociocultural drivers. This review synthesises mechanistic and clinical data, distils methodological lessons and offers practical guidance on when, and how, to consider gluten restriction. A GFD should be a last resort, time-limited probe, supervised by a dietitian, and embedded within multidisciplinary care focused on individual symptom mechanisms.

Best Practice & Research Clinical GastroenterologyVol. 79
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
1.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.