Manual Stress and Gap Spacer Systematically Underestimate Intraoperative Joint Gaps Compared with a Tensor Device in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enables precise bone resection based on intraoperative ligament balance. However, commonly used methods for assessing ligament balance—manual varus/valgus stress and gap spacers—may lack accuracy, potentially affecting surgical outcomes. This study compared intraoperative joint gap measurements among 3 techniques: manual stress, gap spacers, and a novel tensor device. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 59 varus knees that underwent robotic-assisted TKA with a primary prosthesis. Intraoperative joint gaps were digitally measured in both medial and lateral compartments at full extension and 90° flexion using 3 methods: manual stress, gap spacers, and a tensor device applying 120 N force. Measurements were repeated for reliability, and statistical comparisons were made using one-way analysis of variance. Intramethod reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Joint gaps measured using gap spacers were significantly smaller than those obtained with the tensor device (p < 0.05), particularly in flexion. Manual stress yielded intermediate values. The tensor device consistently produced the largest joint gaps. ICCs were >0.8 for all methods, indicating high reproducibility, with the tensor showing the highest consistency. However, manual and spacer methods systematically underestimated joint gaps despite their reproducibility. Conclusions: Manual stress and gap spacer techniques underestimate intraoperative joint gaps, potentially leading to unintended ligament laxity in robotic-assisted TKA. The tensor device provides more accurate and reproducible gap assessment, supporting its use for improved intraoperative decision making. Level of Evidence: Level II Prospective cohort study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBJS Open Access
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.25.00278
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manual Stress and Gap Spacer Systematically Underestimate Intraoperative Joint Gaps Compared with a Tensor Device in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Ryo Sugama, Hidetomi Terai, Yohei Ohyama, Hideki Ueyama et al.
JBJS Open Access
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Manual Stress and Gap Spacer Systematically Underestimate Intraoperative Joint Gaps Compared with a Tensor Device in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Ryo Sugama, Hidetomi Terai, Yohei Ohyama, Hideki Ueyama, Sho Masuda, Yukihide Minoda
article en

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enables precise bone resection based on intraoperative ligament balance. However, commonly used methods for assessing ligament balance—manual varus/valgus stress and gap spacers—may lack accuracy, potentially affecting surgical outcomes. This study compared intraoperative joint gap measurements among 3 techniques: manual stress, gap spacers, and a novel tensor device. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 59 varus knees that underwent robotic-assisted TKA with a primary prosthesis. Intraoperative joint gaps were digitally measured in both medial and lateral compartments at full extension and 90° flexion using 3 methods: manual stress, gap spacers, and a tensor device applying 120 N force. Measurements were repeated for reliability, and statistical comparisons were made using one-way analysis of variance. Intramethod reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Joint gaps measured using gap spacers were significantly smaller than those obtained with the tensor device (p < 0.05), particularly in flexion. Manual stress yielded intermediate values. The tensor device consistently produced the largest joint gaps. ICCs were >0.8 for all methods, indicating high reproducibility, with the tensor showing the highest consistency. However, manual and spacer methods systematically underestimated joint gaps despite their reproducibility. Conclusions: Manual stress and gap spacer techniques underestimate intraoperative joint gaps, potentially leading to unintended ligament laxity in robotic-assisted TKA. The tensor device provides more accurate and reproducible gap assessment, supporting its use for improved intraoperative decision making. Level of Evidence: Level II Prospective cohort study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

JBJS Open AccessVol. 10(4)
Osaka Metropolitan University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.