Children’s Rights or Settler Sovereignty? Rights Declarations, Curriculum Policy, and Settler Colonial Governance

This paper interrogates the coloniality of (human) rights and inclusion by tracing their function within Aotearoa New Zealand’s education policy. Beginning from the global frame of Gaza, where human rights instruments are mobilised to obscure rather than prevent mass violence, the analysis demonstrates that rights frameworks are never neutral. In settler-colonial contexts, they operate as technologies of governance that both promise protection and reproduce dispossession. In Aotearoa, curricular and policy discourses of diversity, biculturalism, and inclusion similarly depoliticise the foundational violence of colonisation. By collapsing the distinct realities of Māori, Pasifika, refugee, and immigrant communities into state-managed categories, the education system sustains the hierarchies it claims to redress. For immigrant children, rights are extended only conditionally, tied to neoliberal benchmarks of economic utility and assimilation, while Māori rights remain constrained within Crown-defined parameters. Drawing on Wolfe’s theorisation of settler colonialism as a structure of elimination and decolonial theory, the paper argues that both Māori dispossession and immigrant conditionality are relational components of a single settler-colonial project. Education, rights, and inclusion thus function less as emancipatory frameworks than as instruments for managing populations and consolidating white settler sovereignty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teachers Work
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v22i2.682
Primary Topic
Peace and Human Rights Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children’s Rights or Settler Sovereignty? Rights Declarations, Curriculum Policy, and Settler Colonial Governance

Mahdis Azarmandi, Maryam Sharifkhani
Teachers Work
Peace and Human Rights Education
article

Children’s Rights or Settler Sovereignty? Rights Declarations, Curriculum Policy, and Settler Colonial Governance

Mahdis Azarmandi, Maryam Sharifkhani
article en

Abstract

This paper interrogates the coloniality of (human) rights and inclusion by tracing their function within Aotearoa New Zealand’s education policy. Beginning from the global frame of Gaza, where human rights instruments are mobilised to obscure rather than prevent mass violence, the analysis demonstrates that rights frameworks are never neutral. In settler-colonial contexts, they operate as technologies of governance that both promise protection and reproduce dispossession. In Aotearoa, curricular and policy discourses of diversity, biculturalism, and inclusion similarly depoliticise the foundational violence of colonisation. By collapsing the distinct realities of Māori, Pasifika, refugee, and immigrant communities into state-managed categories, the education system sustains the hierarchies it claims to redress. For immigrant children, rights are extended only conditionally, tied to neoliberal benchmarks of economic utility and assimilation, while Māori rights remain constrained within Crown-defined parameters. Drawing on Wolfe’s theorisation of settler colonialism as a structure of elimination and decolonial theory, the paper argues that both Māori dispossession and immigrant conditionality are relational components of a single settler-colonial project. Education, rights, and inclusion thus function less as emancipatory frameworks than as instruments for managing populations and consolidating white settler sovereignty.

Teachers WorkVol. 22(2)
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Peace and Human Rights Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.