Cross-national comparison of metabolic syndrome prevalence and related medication use in South Korea and the United States, 2007–2020: Evidence from KHANES and NHANES

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, yet comparative studies between countries are limited. Thus, we aim to compare trends in MetS prevalence, medication use, and component control in South Korea and the US. We analyzed data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2020 for nonpregnant adults. MetS was defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Use of MetS-related medications was defined as the use of antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and lipid-lowering agents. The weighted prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of MetS, its components, and their control among individuals on corresponding medications was analyzed, and adjusted odds ratios for component control by sociodemographic factors were estimated using weighted multivariable logistic regression. A total of 74,714 participants aged ≥20 years from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (male, 43.59%) and 14,036 from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (male, 44.12%) were included in the analysis. MetS prevalence was higher in South Korea (18.47% [95% confidence interval, 18.09-18.85]) than in the United States (6.03% [5.54-6.53]). Among the components of MetS, low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was the most prevalent in South Korea (35.04% [34.57-35.51]), whereas large waist circumference was most common in the United States (48.62% [47.05-50.20]). High prevalence of MetS was associated with older age, obesity, lower income, and nondrinkers in both populations. From 2007 to 2020, antidiabetic use declined in South Korea and increased in the United States, while antihypertensive and lipid-lowering agent use increased in both countries. Among medication users, MetS-related control rates were consistently lower in South Korea compared to the US: fasting glucose (12.76% [10.50-15.03] vs 56.07% [51.15-60.98]), triglycerides (64.39% [63.02-65.77] vs 87.87% [85.90-89.84]), and blood pressure (45.77% [44.72-46.82] vs 55.69% [53.13-58.25]). Significant differences exist in the MetS prevalence, pharmacologic treatment patterns, and control outcomes between South Korea and the US. Targeted strategies tailored to each country-specific context are needed to improve metabolic health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000046484
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-national comparison of metabolic syndrome prevalence and related medication use in South Korea and the United States, 2007–2020: Evidence from KHANES and NHANES

Ho Geol Woo, Yoon G. Lee, Dong Keon Yon, Jaehyun Kong et al.
Medicine
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Cross-national comparison of metabolic syndrome prevalence and related medication use in South Korea and the United States, 2007–2020: Evidence from KHANES and NHANES

Ho Geol Woo, Yoon G. Lee, Dong Keon Yon, Jaehyun Kong, Lee Smith, Jin Young Jeong, Eunchae Lee, Juyeong Kim, Hyunjee Kim, Hajung Joo, Seohyun Hong
article en

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, yet comparative studies between countries are limited. Thus, we aim to compare trends in MetS prevalence, medication use, and component control in South Korea and the US. We analyzed data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2020 for nonpregnant adults. MetS was defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Use of MetS-related medications was defined as the use of antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and lipid-lowering agents. The weighted prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of MetS, its components, and their control among individuals on corresponding medications was analyzed, and adjusted odds ratios for component control by sociodemographic factors were estimated using weighted multivariable logistic regression. A total of 74,714 participants aged ≥20 years from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (male, 43.59%) and 14,036 from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (male, 44.12%) were included in the analysis. MetS prevalence was higher in South Korea (18.47% [95% confidence interval, 18.09-18.85]) than in the United States (6.03% [5.54-6.53]). Among the components of MetS, low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was the most prevalent in South Korea (35.04% [34.57-35.51]), whereas large waist circumference was most common in the United States (48.62% [47.05-50.20]). High prevalence of MetS was associated with older age, obesity, lower income, and nondrinkers in both populations. From 2007 to 2020, antidiabetic use declined in South Korea and increased in the United States, while antihypertensive and lipid-lowering agent use increased in both countries. Among medication users, MetS-related control rates were consistently lower in South Korea compared to the US: fasting glucose (12.76% [10.50-15.03] vs 56.07% [51.15-60.98]), triglycerides (64.39% [63.02-65.77] vs 87.87% [85.90-89.84]), and blood pressure (45.77% [44.72-46.82] vs 55.69% [53.13-58.25]). Significant differences exist in the MetS prevalence, pharmacologic treatment patterns, and control outcomes between South Korea and the US. Targeted strategies tailored to each country-specific context are needed to improve metabolic health.

MedicineVol. 104(50)
Northeastern University (US), Kyung Hee University (KR), Biruni University (TR), Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KR), S.P.E.C.I.E.S. (US), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.