A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Vaccine Efficacy and Its Modifiers

Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) continues to inflict devastating losses on global swine production. By systematically reviewing and meta-analysing 32 high-quality studies, we quantified the protective efficacy of PED vaccines and dissected how core variables shape that protection. Using fecal scores as the endpoint, we pooled effect sizes under a random-effects model and explored sources of heterogeneity through subgroup analyses. This analysis showed a pooled effect size (Hedges' g) of -5.80, confirming that vaccination markedly alleviates diarrheal severity. Moreover, substantial heterogeneity was detected across studies. Stratified analyses revealed that vaccine type, vaccination target, vaccination route, and vaccination frequency are the principal sources of variation, all of which significantly influence vaccine efficacy. Conventional inactivated or live-attenuated formulations still dominate the field, but recombinant live-viral platforms are emerging. Piglets and sows represent the most responsive immunological targets. A two-dose regimen consistently outperforms a single injection, and delivery via intranasal, oral or intramuscular routes offers distinct advantages that can be exploited to maximise mucosal and systemic immunity. Overall, the optimal impact on PED prevention and control is achieved when the vaccine is correctly chosen and paired with an appropriate immunization protocol and delivery route.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15243592
Primary Topic
Animal Virus Infections Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Vaccine Efficacy and Its Modifiers

Shaomei Li, Wei Yao, Hua Zheng, Guoyang Xu et al.
Animals
Animal Virus Infections Studies
article

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Vaccine Efficacy and Its Modifiers

Shaomei Li, Wei Yao, Hua Zheng, Guoyang Xu, Tao Wu, Bo Yao, Sheng Niu, Qian Chen, Yang Liu, Wenjie Ma, Jie Luo, Lizhi Fu
article en

Abstract

Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) continues to inflict devastating losses on global swine production. By systematically reviewing and meta-analysing 32 high-quality studies, we quantified the protective efficacy of PED vaccines and dissected how core variables shape that protection. Using fecal scores as the endpoint, we pooled effect sizes under a random-effects model and explored sources of heterogeneity through subgroup analyses. This analysis showed a pooled effect size (Hedges' g) of -5.80, confirming that vaccination markedly alleviates diarrheal severity. Moreover, substantial heterogeneity was detected across studies. Stratified analyses revealed that vaccine type, vaccination target, vaccination route, and vaccination frequency are the principal sources of variation, all of which significantly influence vaccine efficacy. Conventional inactivated or live-attenuated formulations still dominate the field, but recombinant live-viral platforms are emerging. Piglets and sows represent the most responsive immunological targets. A two-dose regimen consistently outperforms a single injection, and delivery via intranasal, oral or intramuscular routes offers distinct advantages that can be exploited to maximise mucosal and systemic immunity. Overall, the optimal impact on PED prevention and control is achieved when the vaccine is correctly chosen and paired with an appropriate immunization protocol and delivery route.

AnimalsVol. 15(24)
Chongqing Technology and Business University (CN), Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Department (IN), Chongqing Academy of Animal Science (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), Chongqing University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Animal Virus Infections Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.