Lessons from the EU Effort Sharing Decision for Supranational Climate Cooperation: A Firm-Level Analysis

As an example of supranational climate policy coordination for sectors not covered by carbon trading, the European Effort Sharing Decision set national targets for emission reductions for the time period 2013–2020. Member States were free to decide the national policies to implement to achieve these objectives. This is the first quantification of the impact this regulation had on the emissions of firms in the corresponding sectors. We exploit the differences along three variables: a national-level treatment intensity, an exposure index defined at the firm level and a time dimension (before or after the introduction of the policy). We find that, even in countries with no stringent target, emissions from exposed firms tended to decrease more than emissions from non-exposed firms. In addition, each percentage point increase in the stringency of the treatment leads to a 5.7% reduction in emissions for an average exposed firm. This provides interesting insights for other supranational climate agreements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-025-01038-1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons from the EU Effort Sharing Decision for Supranational Climate Cooperation: A Firm-Level Analysis

Lukas Diethelm, Claire Gavard
Environmental and Resource Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Lessons from the EU Effort Sharing Decision for Supranational Climate Cooperation: A Firm-Level Analysis

Lukas Diethelm, Claire Gavard
article en

Abstract

As an example of supranational climate policy coordination for sectors not covered by carbon trading, the European Effort Sharing Decision set national targets for emission reductions for the time period 2013–2020. Member States were free to decide the national policies to implement to achieve these objectives. This is the first quantification of the impact this regulation had on the emissions of firms in the corresponding sectors. We exploit the differences along three variables: a national-level treatment intensity, an exposure index defined at the firm level and a time dimension (before or after the introduction of the policy). We find that, even in countries with no stringent target, emissions from exposed firms tended to decrease more than emissions from non-exposed firms. In addition, each percentage point increase in the stringency of the treatment leads to a 5.7% reduction in emissions for an average exposed firm. This provides interesting insights for other supranational climate agreements.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 88(12)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Centre for European Economic Research (DE)
European Commission, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.