RBA4SDS – Risk–benefit assessment for sustainable dietary shifts

Diets are evolving to cope with the ecological transition and reduce the environmental impact of agri-food systems. The alternatives currently available will influence the nutritional content of diets and will also change consumers' exposure to microbiological and chemical hazards. Health impacts need to be considered to suggest safe, nutritious and sustainable alternatives. Quantifying this overall health impact is now possible using methods of food risk-benefit assessment (RBA), a recognised and well-established approach that integrates scientific knowledge on nutrition, toxicology, microbiology and human epidemiology. The Risk-Benefit Assessment for Sustainable Dietary Shift (RBA4SDS) project aimed to train a fellow to analyse the overall health impacts of dietary transitions towards more climate-friendly diets. This included performing RBA and applying the necessary quantitative tools to evaluate nutritional, microbiological and toxicological risks and benefits. The present project focused on a practical case considering the substitution of meat by insects and plant-based alternatives including lentil and red kidney bean for Croatia, France and Greece. As part of the programme, the fellow was involved in the following activities: (i) understanding key steps of food health RBA, with a focus on nutrition, microbiology and toxicology; (ii) defining and characterising various sustainable diet alternatives, including meat, insect-based and plant-based options; (iii) identifying available and missing data inputs needed for RBA of selected alternative scenarios; (iv) applying RBA methods to assess a chosen alternative scenarios; (v) identifying strategies for further development of RBA methodologies. Within the research group, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool was used to rank sustainable options for alternative scenarios. The project enabled the fellow to define different sustainable food alternatives and to identify both available and missing inputs required to perform RBA and to suggest strategies to develop further RBA methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231109
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RBA4SDS – Risk–benefit assessment for sustainable dietary shifts

Géraldine Boué, Martina Pavlić
EFSA Journal
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

RBA4SDS – Risk–benefit assessment for sustainable dietary shifts

Géraldine Boué, Martina Pavlić
article en

Abstract

Diets are evolving to cope with the ecological transition and reduce the environmental impact of agri-food systems. The alternatives currently available will influence the nutritional content of diets and will also change consumers' exposure to microbiological and chemical hazards. Health impacts need to be considered to suggest safe, nutritious and sustainable alternatives. Quantifying this overall health impact is now possible using methods of food risk-benefit assessment (RBA), a recognised and well-established approach that integrates scientific knowledge on nutrition, toxicology, microbiology and human epidemiology. The Risk-Benefit Assessment for Sustainable Dietary Shift (RBA4SDS) project aimed to train a fellow to analyse the overall health impacts of dietary transitions towards more climate-friendly diets. This included performing RBA and applying the necessary quantitative tools to evaluate nutritional, microbiological and toxicological risks and benefits. The present project focused on a practical case considering the substitution of meat by insects and plant-based alternatives including lentil and red kidney bean for Croatia, France and Greece. As part of the programme, the fellow was involved in the following activities: (i) understanding key steps of food health RBA, with a focus on nutrition, microbiology and toxicology; (ii) defining and characterising various sustainable diet alternatives, including meat, insect-based and plant-based options; (iii) identifying available and missing data inputs needed for RBA of selected alternative scenarios; (iv) applying RBA methods to assess a chosen alternative scenarios; (v) identifying strategies for further development of RBA methodologies. Within the research group, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool was used to rank sustainable options for alternative scenarios. The project enabled the fellow to define different sustainable food alternatives and to identify both available and missing inputs required to perform RBA and to suggest strategies to develop further RBA methodology.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(Suppl 1)
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Croatian Personal Data Protection Agency (HR), Oniris (FR)
European Food Safety Authority
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.