Can naive and expert users spot the difference between AI vs. human-generalized maps?

As it is evident to the trained cartographers, the decision making process leading to designing a legible map at a smaller scale is called cartographic generalization.Through various operators, cartographic generalization seeks e.g., the selection and simplification of the spatial data to adapt it to the target detail level, specific application and user requirements (Kraak et al., 2020).Researchers have used a variety of artificial intelligence (AI) methods to automate cartographic generalization throughout decades, with a marked amplification in such efforts in recent years, including expert systems, multi-agent systems and machine learning approaches (Touya et al.,

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Abstracts of the ICA
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-10-140-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can naive and expert users spot the difference between AI vs. human-generalized maps?

Arzu Çöltekin, Veronica Sundstedt, Izabela Karsznia
1 citations
Abstracts of the ICA
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.68
article

Can naive and expert users spot the difference between AI vs. human-generalized maps?

Arzu Çöltekin, Veronica Sundstedt, Izabela Karsznia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As it is evident to the trained cartographers, the decision making process leading to designing a legible map at a smaller scale is called cartographic generalization.Through various operators, cartographic generalization seeks e.g., the selection and simplification of the spatial data to adapt it to the target detail level, specific application and user requirements (Kraak et al., 2020).Researchers have used a variety of artificial intelligence (AI) methods to automate cartographic generalization throughout decades, with a marked amplification in such efforts in recent years, including expert systems, multi-agent systems and machine learning approaches (Touya et al.,

Abstracts of the ICAVol. 10
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH), University of Warsaw (PL), Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.