Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on technology in transitional care: A multisite qualitative study on current practices, challenges, and future directions
<b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' views on the use of technology in adult transitional care, identifying challenges, critical procedures, and enabling factors for adoption. <b>Methods:</b> This was a prospective, multisite qualitative study. Data were collected through semi-structured co-creation sessions that explored two main themes, clinical decision-making and technology use in transitional care, through the lenses of current practices, challenges, and future directions. Data were analysed using constant comparison analysis by three independent researchers through iterative open, axial, and selective coding, followed by an impact relationship analysis to explore interconnections between themes. <b>Results:</b> Eleven co-creation sessions were held involving 115 participants. Findings highlight five key transitional care processes, beginning with patient assessment and evaluation, continuing through discharge planning and adherence to protocols, and extending to post-discharge support and follow-up care. The results show how technology can enhance each of these steps by improving digital literacy, user-friendliness, interoperability, and the flow of information. Cross-cutting barriers such as limited resources, privacy concerns, and lack of trust in technology were also identified. <b>Conclusions:</b> Technological tools can support various aspects and processes of transitional care, but their effective adoption requires a distinct set of strategies to address the multiple and complex factors involved.
Authors
- Despoina Petsani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0273-6890)
- Dorra Rakia Allegue (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-7738)
- Eva Kehayia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4463-1376)
- Rosa Maria Resende de Almeida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3721-7214)
- Teemu Santonen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-6472)
- Gloria Cea (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-4672)
- Leen Broeckx (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2067-6182)
- Enikő Nagy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1868-5290)
- S. Ballesteros (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7304-5852)
- Sofia Segkouli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-0451)
- Panagiotis D. Bamidis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-5805)
- Beatriz Merino‐Barbancho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-4178)
- Vasileia Petronikolou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6878-8418)
- Michael Doumas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-8044)
- Evdokimos Konstantinidis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5522-9553)
- Mika Alastalo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-1879)
- Sara Ahmed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-6790)
Institutions
- Thomas More University (US)
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- Information Technologies Institute (GR)
- Fundación INTRAS (ES)
- Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
- Center for Independent Living (US)
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- Laurea University of Applied Sciences (FI)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Health Informatics Journal
- Published
- 2025-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251404770
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.88