Impella vs. IABP in Non-emergent High-Risk PCI: Outcomes and LVEF Recovery from a Large US EHR Study

In contemporary, non-protocolized, non-emergent HR-PCI, the use of Impella was associated with improved outcomes and greater LVEF recovery compared to IABP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology and Therapy
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-025-00441-5
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impella vs. IABP in Non-emergent High-Risk PCI: Outcomes and LVEF Recovery from a Large US EHR Study

Jason Wollmuth, Ali Almedhychy, Aditya Bharadwaj, William W. O’Neill et al.
Cardiology and Therapy
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Impella vs. IABP in Non-emergent High-Risk PCI: Outcomes and LVEF Recovery from a Large US EHR Study

Jason Wollmuth, Ali Almedhychy, Aditya Bharadwaj, William W. O’Neill, Nudrat Noor
article en

Abstract

In contemporary, non-protocolized, non-emergent HR-PCI, the use of Impella was associated with improved outcomes and greater LVEF recovery compared to IABP.

Cardiology and TherapyVol. 15(1)
Loma Linda University Medical Center (US), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Henry Ford Health System (US), Loma Linda University (US), Providence Health & Services (US)
Abiomed
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.