Regulatory alignment in FDA expedited pathways for infectious diseases: a decadal review with predictive modeling insights

Despite infectious diseases being a significant threat to global health, there are continuing concerns that regulatory authorities do not prioritize therapeutic strategies for infectious diseases with the same urgency as those for oncological or orphan diseases. This study aims to examine the differences in the productivity of drug development and approval procedures between non-infectious and infectious diseases, and to determine the utilization patterns of acceleration programs. All molecules and biologic products approved between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2024 (N = 464) were subject to a cross-sectional study. Drugs@FDA, the Federal Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov were used as sources of data to establish median Clinical Development Time (CDT), Regulatory Approval Time (RAT), and cumulative Regulatory Review Time (RRT). Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare median values (interquartile range, IQR), and chi-square tests were used for proportions. Time-to-event differences were tested using Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank testing, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Multivariable logistic regression with interaction terms was used to model Priority Review, Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, and Accelerated Approval, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Of 464 approvals, 65 (14.0%) targeted infectious diseases. Median CDT was 2.76 years (IQR 1.80-4.25) versus 3.46 years (IQR 2.59-4.66; p = 0.003), and median RRT was 3.54 years (IQR 2.58-5.03) versus 4.22 years (IQR 3.24-5.73; p = 0.006) for infectious and non‑infectious drugs, respectively. Nevertheless, infectious agents were approved 58% faster (HR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.15-2.16; p = 0.0047). Infectious disease products were more likely to receive Fast Track (OR = 4.49; 95% CI 2.39-8.70) and Priority Review (OR = 10.69; 95% CI 4.57-29.50) but less likely to obtain Breakthrough Therapy (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.28-0.63) or Accelerated Approval (OR = 0.12; 95% CI 0.016-0.56). Infectious disease treatments outpace non-infectious disease treatments in terms of drug development and approval timelines. Nevertheless, they are less frequently utilized in pathways like Accelerated Approval, which are scientifically less applicable to acute-disease endpoints. Therefore, policy reforms should focus on addressing the underlying economic and scientific barriers to anti-infective innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30452-0
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory alignment in FDA expedited pathways for infectious diseases: a decadal review with predictive modeling insights

Abdelrahman Gamil Gad, Zhilin Zhang, Thi Thu Hoai Nguyen, Jeza Muhamad Abdul Aziz et al.
Scientific Reports
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Regulatory alignment in FDA expedited pathways for infectious diseases: a decadal review with predictive modeling insights

Abdelrahman Gamil Gad, Zhilin Zhang, Thi Thu Hoai Nguyen, Jeza Muhamad Abdul Aziz, Randa Elsheikh, Norio Ohmagari, Nguyen Tien Huy, Ahmed M. Sayed, Mohammad Najm Dadam, Thành Tâm Nguyên, Phillip Tran
article en

Abstract

Despite infectious diseases being a significant threat to global health, there are continuing concerns that regulatory authorities do not prioritize therapeutic strategies for infectious diseases with the same urgency as those for oncological or orphan diseases. This study aims to examine the differences in the productivity of drug development and approval procedures between non-infectious and infectious diseases, and to determine the utilization patterns of acceleration programs. All molecules and biologic products approved between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2024 (N = 464) were subject to a cross-sectional study. Drugs@FDA, the Federal Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov were used as sources of data to establish median Clinical Development Time (CDT), Regulatory Approval Time (RAT), and cumulative Regulatory Review Time (RRT). Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare median values (interquartile range, IQR), and chi-square tests were used for proportions. Time-to-event differences were tested using Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank testing, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Multivariable logistic regression with interaction terms was used to model Priority Review, Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, and Accelerated Approval, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Of 464 approvals, 65 (14.0%) targeted infectious diseases. Median CDT was 2.76 years (IQR 1.80-4.25) versus 3.46 years (IQR 2.59-4.66; p = 0.003), and median RRT was 3.54 years (IQR 2.58-5.03) versus 4.22 years (IQR 3.24-5.73; p = 0.006) for infectious and non‑infectious drugs, respectively. Nevertheless, infectious agents were approved 58% faster (HR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.15-2.16; p = 0.0047). Infectious disease products were more likely to receive Fast Track (OR = 4.49; 95% CI 2.39-8.70) and Priority Review (OR = 10.69; 95% CI 4.57-29.50) but less likely to obtain Breakthrough Therapy (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.28-0.63) or Accelerated Approval (OR = 0.12; 95% CI 0.016-0.56). Infectious disease treatments outpace non-infectious disease treatments in terms of drug development and approval timelines. Nevertheless, they are less frequently utilized in pathways like Accelerated Approval, which are scientifically less applicable to acute-disease endpoints. Therefore, policy reforms should focus on addressing the underlying economic and scientific barriers to anti-infective innovation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN), Johns Hopkins University (US), Duy Tan University (VN), Can Tho University (VN), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Komar University of Science and Technology (IQ), National Center for Global Health and Medicine (JP), Helios Hospital Schwerin (DE), Science Club (US), Harasanshin Hospital (JP), Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Nagasaki University (JP), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.