Evaluation of the impact of blast damage on tunnel surrounding rock induced by C-type cumulative tube cone angle

Over-excavation and under-excavation are common issues in tunnel construction using the drilling and blasting method. In some cases, traditional blasting techniques may fail to achieve the desired results. This study systematically investigates the blasting-induced damage effects of C-type cumulative tubes with varying cone angles in different grades of tunnel surrounding rock, aiming to mitigate over-excavation and under-excavation issues while enhancing construction efficiency. First, the working principles of cumulative charges and their mechanisms in rock penetration and fragmentation were systematically analyzed based on the fundamental theory of cumulative blasting. Subsequently, numerical models of single-hole cumulative blasting were developed for both III-level and IV-level surrounding rock conditions to examine the influence of cumulative cone angles on rock crack propagation. Finally, field validation tests were conducted at a tunnel construction site in Chamdo, Tibet. Results showed that a 65° cone angle provided the best performance in III-level rock, while a 55° angle worked best in IV-level rock. Compared to traditional methods, the cumulative charge method increased contour hole spacing by 12 ~ 18% and reduced construction costs by 23.5%. It also cut over-excavation by 58.3% and improved half-hole preservation by 41.7%, ensuring better excavation profile integrity and effectively addressing excavation issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31460-w
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the impact of blast damage on tunnel surrounding rock induced by C-type cumulative tube cone angle

Gang Hu, Yan Yu, Hongguang Ji, Shijie Bao et al.
Scientific Reports
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Evaluation of the impact of blast damage on tunnel surrounding rock induced by C-type cumulative tube cone angle

Gang Hu, Yan Yu, Hongguang Ji, Shijie Bao, Honglu Fei, Jian Guo
article en

Abstract

Over-excavation and under-excavation are common issues in tunnel construction using the drilling and blasting method. In some cases, traditional blasting techniques may fail to achieve the desired results. This study systematically investigates the blasting-induced damage effects of C-type cumulative tubes with varying cone angles in different grades of tunnel surrounding rock, aiming to mitigate over-excavation and under-excavation issues while enhancing construction efficiency. First, the working principles of cumulative charges and their mechanisms in rock penetration and fragmentation were systematically analyzed based on the fundamental theory of cumulative blasting. Subsequently, numerical models of single-hole cumulative blasting were developed for both III-level and IV-level surrounding rock conditions to examine the influence of cumulative cone angles on rock crack propagation. Finally, field validation tests were conducted at a tunnel construction site in Chamdo, Tibet. Results showed that a 65° cone angle provided the best performance in III-level rock, while a 55° angle worked best in IV-level rock. Compared to traditional methods, the cumulative charge method increased contour hole spacing by 12 ~ 18% and reduced construction costs by 23.5%. It also cut over-excavation by 58.3% and improved half-hole preservation by 41.7%, ensuring better excavation profile integrity and effectively addressing excavation issues.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Liaoning Technical University (CN)
Jianghan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.