Navigating carbon neutrality: policy pathways and consistency on industrial decarbonization in China

Climate change has intensified global demands for industrial decarbonization and carbon neutrality. As the world's largest carbon emitter, China's policy approach is pivotal to international climate governance and the low-carbon transition. This study conducts the first systematic evaluation of China's industrial decarbonization policy framework established toward the carbon neutrality goal. Through a mixed-methods approach combining bibliometric analysis and Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) Index, we analyze 58 national policy documents comprising approximately 610,000 Chinese characters. Results across five key decarbonization pathways show notable disparities in policy consistency: carbon emission abatement achieves perfect consistency (PMC-Index = 9.07), reflecting China's prioritization of greenhouse gas emission controls, while energy efficiency (8.14) and scientific and technological innovation (8.12) demonstrate good consistency. By contrast, socio-economic risk mitigation (6.97) and circular economy (6.77) pathways only reach acceptable levels, revealing gaps in integrating just transition principles and industrial symbiosis. The asymmetric consistency stems from a misalignment across the five policy pathways, particularly the underdeveloped linkages between decarbonization, circularity, and socio-economic consideration. We recommend strengthening circular economy institutions through sector-specific material flow governance and industrial symbiosis networks, alongside proactive just transition policies such as skill development initiatives and compensatory mechanisms for vulnerable communities. This study contributes to theories of environmental governance and policy mixes, while offering globally applicable insights for reconciling emission reduction with industrial competitiveness and social equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Balance and Management
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-025-00356-7
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating carbon neutrality: policy pathways and consistency on industrial decarbonization in China

Wanhao Zhang, Cheng Zhou, Clare Richardson-Barlow, Zhenhua Zhang
7 citations
Carbon Balance and Management
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
8.70
article

Navigating carbon neutrality: policy pathways and consistency on industrial decarbonization in China

Wanhao Zhang, Cheng Zhou, Clare Richardson-Barlow, Zhenhua Zhang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Climate change has intensified global demands for industrial decarbonization and carbon neutrality. As the world's largest carbon emitter, China's policy approach is pivotal to international climate governance and the low-carbon transition. This study conducts the first systematic evaluation of China's industrial decarbonization policy framework established toward the carbon neutrality goal. Through a mixed-methods approach combining bibliometric analysis and Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) Index, we analyze 58 national policy documents comprising approximately 610,000 Chinese characters. Results across five key decarbonization pathways show notable disparities in policy consistency: carbon emission abatement achieves perfect consistency (PMC-Index = 9.07), reflecting China's prioritization of greenhouse gas emission controls, while energy efficiency (8.14) and scientific and technological innovation (8.12) demonstrate good consistency. By contrast, socio-economic risk mitigation (6.97) and circular economy (6.77) pathways only reach acceptable levels, revealing gaps in integrating just transition principles and industrial symbiosis. The asymmetric consistency stems from a misalignment across the five policy pathways, particularly the underdeveloped linkages between decarbonization, circularity, and socio-economic consideration. We recommend strengthening circular economy institutions through sector-specific material flow governance and industrial symbiosis networks, alongside proactive just transition policies such as skill development initiatives and compensatory mechanisms for vulnerable communities. This study contributes to theories of environmental governance and policy mixes, while offering globally applicable insights for reconciling emission reduction with industrial competitiveness and social equity.

Carbon Balance and ManagementVol. 20(1)
University of Leeds (GB), Government of Jiangsu Province (CN), Huaiyin Normal University (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
8.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.