Artificial Intelligence in Malocclusion Diagnosis: Capabilities, Challenges, and Clinical Integration

Background: This narrative review synthesizes evidence on AI for orthodontic malocclusion diagnosis across five imaging modalities and maps diagnostic metrics to validation tiers and regulatory readiness, with focused appraisal of Class III detection (2019–2025). Key algorithms, datasets, clinical validation, and ethical/regulatory considerations are synthesized. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published January 2019–October 2025 using (“artificial intelligence”) AND (“malocclusion” OR “skeletal class”) AND “cephalometric.” Records were screened independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Eligible studies reported diagnostic performance (accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity/specificity) or landmark-localization error for AI-based malocclusion diagnosis. Data on dataset size and validation design were extracted; no formal quality appraisal or risk-of-bias assessments were undertaken, consistent with a narrative review. Results: Deep learning models show high diagnostic accuracy: cephalogram classifiers reach 90–96% for skeletal Class I/II/III; intraoral photograph models achieve 89–93% for Angle molar relationships; automated landmarkers localize ~75% of points within 2 mm. On 9870 multicenter cephalograms, landmarking achieved 0.94 ± 0.74 mm with ≈89% skeletal-class accuracy when landmarks fed a classifier. Conclusion: AI can reduce cephalometric tracing time by ~70–80% and provide consistent skeletal classification. Regulator-aligned benchmarks (multicenter external tests, subgroup reporting, explainability) and pragmatic open-data priorities are outlined, positioning AI as a dependable co-pilot once these gaps are closed.