Legal limitations and justifications in the training and deployment of generative AI models under copyright law

Abstract The article investigates the legal limitations and exceptions relevant to the training and deployment of generative AI models under EU copyright law. It analyzes whether existing copyright exceptions, such as those for temporary reproduction, scientific text and data mining (TDM) and commercial TDM, can be applied to AI training processes. These exceptions generally do not apply due to fundamental technological and conceptual diff erences between traditional TDM and AI model training. The authors also evaluate the applicability of other exceptions (e.g., quotation, parody or private use) to the public use and output of generative AI. Ultimately, the article argues that current legal frameworks inadequately address the unique challenges posed by generative AI technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TalTech journal of European studies/TalTech journal of European studies.
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2025-0035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal limitations and justifications in the training and deployment of generative AI models under copyright law

Rastislav Funta, Denisa Krásna
1 citations
TalTech journal of European studies/TalTech journal of European studies.
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
2.48
article

Legal limitations and justifications in the training and deployment of generative AI models under copyright law

Rastislav Funta, Denisa Krásna
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The article investigates the legal limitations and exceptions relevant to the training and deployment of generative AI models under EU copyright law. It analyzes whether existing copyright exceptions, such as those for temporary reproduction, scientific text and data mining (TDM) and commercial TDM, can be applied to AI training processes. These exceptions generally do not apply due to fundamental technological and conceptual diff erences between traditional TDM and AI model training. The authors also evaluate the applicability of other exceptions (e.g., quotation, parody or private use) to the public use and output of generative AI. Ultimately, the article argues that current legal frameworks inadequately address the unique challenges posed by generative AI technologies.

TalTech journal of European studies/TalTech journal of European studies.Vol. 15(3)
Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava (SK), Danubius University (SK), Bratislava University of Economics and Business (SK)
Tallinna Tehnikaülikool
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal limitations and justifications in the training and deployment of generative AI models under copyright law — Rastislav Funta, Denisa Krásna · TalTech journal of European studies/TalTech journal of European studies. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS