From Technological Alienation to Spiritual Homecoming: Zhuangzi’s Affective Philosophy in Conversation with Western Emotion Theories

As emotion becomes increasingly digitized, there is a growing risk that computational systems may overreach, shaping or managing affect in ways that undermine human autonomy. This study builds a cross-cultural dialog between Daoist affective philosophy and Western theories of emotion to address this problem. By comparing their assumptions about emotional life—what emotions are, how they should be guided, and what counts as appropriate intervention—the paper develops a set of ethical principles for the design of affective technologies. Through textual analysis and a historical–conceptual review, the study identifies three safeguards drawn from Daoist thought—minimality, autonomy, and reversibility—and translates them into practical guidance for data use, system behavior, and user interaction. A brief case from Finland’s well-being initiatives illustrates how these principles can redirect technological design toward supporting inner balance and self-directed regulation rather than external control. The paper’s contribution lies in offering a clear boundary ethics for affective computing, showing how Daoist ideas of moderation and self-cultivation can help prevent emotional alienation while still allowing technological systems to enhance human well-being.