Does the Selected Segment Within a Two-Legged Hopping Trial Alter Leg Stiffness and Kinetic Performance Values and Their Variability?

Two-legged hopping is a well-established model for assessing leg stiffness; however, in existing studies, it is unclear whether the trial segment selection affects the results. This study aimed to assess if the selected hopping segment alters the value and individual variability (%CVind) of leg stiffness and kinetic performance metrics. Elite women athletes (42, volleyball, basketball, handball) and 14 non-athletic women performed barefoot two-legged hopping (130 bpm) on a force-plate (Kistler, 9286AA, sampling at 1000 Hz). Leg stiffness was estimated from the Fz registration (resonant frequency method). Four cumulative range segments (1-10, 1-20, 1-30, and 1-40 hops) and three segments of 10-hop subranges (11-20, 21-30, and 31-40) were analyzed (repeated measures one-way Anova, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05, SPSS v30.0). The hopping segment did not significantly alter the leg stiffness value (segment average 30.6 to 31.2 kN/m) or its %CVind (segment average ≈ 3%). The kinetic performance metrics depicted a solid foundation for the extracted leg stiffness value, with %CVind not exceeding 6.2%. The results indicate a data collection of just 15 hops, in continuance reduced to a 10 hops segment (after excluding the first five to avoid neuromuscular adaptation) as a robust reference choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods and Protocols
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8060152
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the Selected Segment Within a Two-Legged Hopping Trial Alter Leg Stiffness and Kinetic Performance Values and Their Variability?

Karolina Barzouka, Analina Emmanouil, Elissavet N. Rousanoglou, Konstantinos Boudolos et al.
Methods and Protocols
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Does the Selected Segment Within a Two-Legged Hopping Trial Alter Leg Stiffness and Kinetic Performance Values and Their Variability?

Karolina Barzouka, Analina Emmanouil, Elissavet N. Rousanoglou, Konstantinos Boudolos, Ourania Tata
article en

Abstract

Two-legged hopping is a well-established model for assessing leg stiffness; however, in existing studies, it is unclear whether the trial segment selection affects the results. This study aimed to assess if the selected hopping segment alters the value and individual variability (%CVind) of leg stiffness and kinetic performance metrics. Elite women athletes (42, volleyball, basketball, handball) and 14 non-athletic women performed barefoot two-legged hopping (130 bpm) on a force-plate (Kistler, 9286AA, sampling at 1000 Hz). Leg stiffness was estimated from the Fz registration (resonant frequency method). Four cumulative range segments (1-10, 1-20, 1-30, and 1-40 hops) and three segments of 10-hop subranges (11-20, 21-30, and 31-40) were analyzed (repeated measures one-way Anova, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05, SPSS v30.0). The hopping segment did not significantly alter the leg stiffness value (segment average 30.6 to 31.2 kN/m) or its %CVind (segment average ≈ 3%). The kinetic performance metrics depicted a solid foundation for the extracted leg stiffness value, with %CVind not exceeding 6.2%. The results indicate a data collection of just 15 hops, in continuance reduced to a 10 hops segment (after excluding the first five to avoid neuromuscular adaptation) as a robust reference choice.

Methods and ProtocolsVol. 8(6)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
McGill University, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.