Neurodegenerative Biomarkers in Populations with Intellectual Disabilities: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Capacities

Populations with intellectual disabilities, especially individuals with genetic syndromes such as Down syndrome, are at very high risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases. This article aims to systematically review the capacities and limitations of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases in these vulnerable populations. A narrative review was conducted using a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2000 and 2025 on biomarkers in intellectual disability and neurodegenerative diseases. Peer-reviewed articles in English or Persian were included, and the extracted data were synthesized thematically. Findings show that various biomarkers, including protein biomarkers (such as Aβ and tau), imaging (such as PET and MRI), genetic biomarkers, and fluid-based (blood and CSF) biomarkers, have significant potential in early diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and evaluating treatment response. However, the use of these biomarkers in the population with intellectual disabilities faces unique challenges, including inherent biological heterogeneity, the presence of comorbidities, methodological barriers in assessment, and complex ethical considerations. The final conclusion indicates that achieving the maximum potential of these biomarkers requires the development of standardized and validated protocols for this specific population, conducting further longitudinal studies, and seriously considering ethical issues. This review emphasizes the importance of international collaborations and multidisciplinary approaches for transforming clinical care for these individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262412001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurodegenerative Biomarkers in Populations with Intellectual Disabilities: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Capacities

Mohammad Tahan, Ainaz Shateri
2 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
3.76
article

Neurodegenerative Biomarkers in Populations with Intellectual Disabilities: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Capacities

Mohammad Tahan, Ainaz Shateri
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Populations with intellectual disabilities, especially individuals with genetic syndromes such as Down syndrome, are at very high risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases. This article aims to systematically review the capacities and limitations of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases in these vulnerable populations. A narrative review was conducted using a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2000 and 2025 on biomarkers in intellectual disability and neurodegenerative diseases. Peer-reviewed articles in English or Persian were included, and the extracted data were synthesized thematically. Findings show that various biomarkers, including protein biomarkers (such as Aβ and tau), imaging (such as PET and MRI), genetic biomarkers, and fluid-based (blood and CSF) biomarkers, have significant potential in early diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and evaluating treatment response. However, the use of these biomarkers in the population with intellectual disabilities faces unique challenges, including inherent biological heterogeneity, the presence of comorbidities, methodological barriers in assessment, and complex ethical considerations. The final conclusion indicates that achieving the maximum potential of these biomarkers requires the development of standardized and validated protocols for this specific population, conducting further longitudinal studies, and seriously considering ethical issues. This review emphasizes the importance of international collaborations and multidisciplinary approaches for transforming clinical care for these individuals.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 26(24)
American Psychological Association (US), Florida International University (US), University of Tehran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.