Acidification and nitrification inhibition of manure alters greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen cycling in diverse agricultural soils

Manure amendments are widely used in agriculture to enhance crop productivity and maintain soil organic matter, but they also contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen (N) losses. Manure acidification and nitrification inhibitors (NIs) have been proposed as mitigation strategies, but their effectiveness likely varies with soil characteristics. To evaluate the influence of acidified and NI-treated manure on N cycling across different soil types, we conducted a 28-day laboratory incubation using soils collected from major agricultural regions in Wisconsin. We measured emissions of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), nitric oxide (NO), carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), along with soil ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub> <sup>+</sup>) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub> <sup>-</sup>) dynamics. Acidified manure enhanced short-term NH<sub>4</sub> <sup>+</sup> retention in all soils but increased cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in the sandy soil compared to untreated manure, likely due to pH-driven disruption of nitrification and incomplete denitrification. In contrast, the NI dicyandiamide (DCD) consistently suppressed nitrification early in the incubation, resulting in significantly lower N<sub>2</sub>O and NO emissions, often approaching levels observed in the no-manure controls, particularly in the sandy soil. Manure amendments increased CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes relative to the no-manure controls, but acidified manure emitted less CO<sub>2</sub> than DCD-treated manure, likely due to temporary suppression of microbial respiration. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were minimal and largely unaffected by treatments. NIs offer consistent benefits in reducing N<sub>2</sub>O and NO losses, while acidification can increase these emissions in certain soil conditions, highlighting the importance of tailoring management practices to specific soil characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Quality
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70123
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acidification and nitrification inhibition of manure alters greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen cycling in diverse agricultural soils

Steven J. Hall, Xia Zhu‐Barker, Mitch Wodrich
Journal of Environmental Quality
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Acidification and nitrification inhibition of manure alters greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen cycling in diverse agricultural soils

Steven J. Hall, Xia Zhu‐Barker, Mitch Wodrich
article en

Abstract

Manure amendments are widely used in agriculture to enhance crop productivity and maintain soil organic matter, but they also contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen (N) losses. Manure acidification and nitrification inhibitors (NIs) have been proposed as mitigation strategies, but their effectiveness likely varies with soil characteristics. To evaluate the influence of acidified and NI-treated manure on N cycling across different soil types, we conducted a 28-day laboratory incubation using soils collected from major agricultural regions in Wisconsin. We measured emissions of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), nitric oxide (NO), carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), along with soil ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub> <sup>+</sup>) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub> <sup>-</sup>) dynamics. Acidified manure enhanced short-term NH<sub>4</sub> <sup>+</sup> retention in all soils but increased cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in the sandy soil compared to untreated manure, likely due to pH-driven disruption of nitrification and incomplete denitrification. In contrast, the NI dicyandiamide (DCD) consistently suppressed nitrification early in the incubation, resulting in significantly lower N<sub>2</sub>O and NO emissions, often approaching levels observed in the no-manure controls, particularly in the sandy soil. Manure amendments increased CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes relative to the no-manure controls, but acidified manure emitted less CO<sub>2</sub> than DCD-treated manure, likely due to temporary suppression of microbial respiration. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were minimal and largely unaffected by treatments. NIs offer consistent benefits in reducing N<sub>2</sub>O and NO losses, while acidification can increase these emissions in certain soil conditions, highlighting the importance of tailoring management practices to specific soil characteristics.

Journal of Environmental QualityVol. 55(1)
University of Wisconsin System (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Curtin University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.