Steering Protein Generative Models at Test-Time for Guided AAV2 Capsid Design
Recent advances in protein generative models have created new opportunities for protein engineering. However, a significant challenge remains in effectively steering these models to generate sequences with specific, desired functionalities, especially when these properties are defined by "black-box" or non-differentiable fitness functions. To address this, we present ProVADA+, a model-agnostic framework that guides pretrained generative models at testtime without costly retraining. Our approach introduces a reinforcement learning-based adaptive masking technique (MADA-DUCB) that significantly accelerates convergence. We demonstrate this framework on the challenging task of designing novel Adeno-Associated Virus 2 (AAV2) capsids. By coupling a ProteinMPNN generative prior with a fine-tuned AAV viability oracle, our method successfully navigates the rugged fitness landscape where unguided random mutagenesis is ineffective-with prior experiments showing as few as 0.3% of variants with six or more mutations are viable. In its final iterations, ProVADA generated a pool of novel candidates with a mean viral selection score of 2.72, consistently scoring highly viable variants while maintaining a diverse range of sequence similarity to the wildtype sequence. Our results show that ProVADA provides a powerful and efficient framework for accelerating the design of proteins with complex, user-defined properties.
Authors
- Wing Hung Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7466-2339)
- Luis Santiago Mille (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-1522)
- Xiaojing Gao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-1456)
- Wenhui Sophia Lu
- Euan Angus Ashley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-9577)
- Xiaowei Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7443-0562)
- Ben Viggiano
Institutions
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1142/9789819824755_0031
- Primary Topic
- Virus-based gene therapy research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00