Quantifying surprise in clinical care: Detecting highly informative events in electronic health records with foundation models

We present a foundation model-derived method to identify highly informative tokens and events in electronic health records. Our approach considers incoming data for the entire context of a patient's hospitalization to find surprising events. Context enables flagging anomalous events that rule-based approaches would consider within a normal range. We demonstrate that the events our model flags are significantly more useful than average events for predicting downstream patient outcomes and show that a fraction of events we identify as unsurprising can be safely dropped without an adverse impact on performance. Finally, we show how informativeness can help interpret the predictions of prognostic models trained on foundation model-derived representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789819824755_0013
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying surprise in clinical care: Detecting highly informative events in electronic health records with foundation models

Michael C. Burkhart, William F. Parker, Brett K. Beaulieu-Jones, Bashar Ramadan et al.
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Quantifying surprise in clinical care: Detecting highly informative events in electronic health records with foundation models

Michael C. Burkhart, William F. Parker, Brett K. Beaulieu-Jones, Bashar Ramadan, Luke Solo
article en

Abstract

We present a foundation model-derived method to identify highly informative tokens and events in electronic health records. Our approach considers incoming data for the entire context of a patient's hospitalization to find surprising events. Context enables flagging anomalous events that rule-based approaches would consider within a normal range. We demonstrate that the events our model flags are significantly more useful than average events for predicting downstream patient outcomes and show that a fraction of events we identify as unsurprising can be safely dropped without an adverse impact on performance. Finally, we show how informativeness can help interpret the predictions of prognostic models trained on foundation model-derived representations.

Vol. 31
University of Chicago (US)
University of Chicago, National Institutes of Health, U.S. National Library of Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.